Leanid
Leanid
Leanid

It's probably because of the Wii U's controller that they're reluctant. They would be expected to take advantage of the controller but that would require more work and creativity for something that can't be ported. Having said that I don't think they'll shun it completely. Probably stagger the release so that it comes

"but they don't know HOW good games happen"

"Good developers and designers will leave, and third parties will shun the company."

You have an accurate opinion on what they've shown and what we've seen. And what they've shown is the MC only killing the British despite them stating otherwise.

You've got nothing on Russians.

I killed a fuckton of guards in the other games that weren't all Templars.

"WAit until you've finished the game and then complain about bias."

Competitive games breed competitive players. Competitive players are aggressive because that's what it means to be competitive.

That's a bullshit excuse and you know it. If they really cared about stability they would just get more servers. Use some of that money they made from the game and the money they will make with their cut from the RMAH. All their decisions seem to revolve around forcing players to engage with the AH. How about giving

What is it with systems these days that punish power gamers? I don't qualify as such anymore but I still think it's complete bullshit.

4th place with only 5 real competitors, with the last one being the Wii, isn't good. Being outsold by the 3DS by anywhere from 8 to 13 times isn't a lot of support. Being outsold by the system it was meant to replace isn't anything close to what one would call good support. It's on par or very slightly ahead of the

No, they're not. PSP is outselling the Vita. The Vita has also dropped below 10,000 sold a week for a few weeks now. In terms of game sales Vita games are almost never in the top 20 much less the top 10.

If they cared about the price and consumers they wouldn't have used Bluray. A large chunk of the $200 difference between the PS3 and 360 had to be the Bluray player. PS2 BC? With the second round of PS3's they had switched to emulation instead of having the actual chip built in. At that point any argument about the

More platforms isn't a good thing, more game types on multiple platforms is even worse. All it does is lead to homogenizing and distilling game experiences to reach the widest audience at the expense of the uniqueness offered by individual platforms. I'm convinced the reason we got so many great console games last

It's not just the gamers. Businesses are losing money. Since those businesses are paying royalties to Blizzard for their product/service and requires the product to be functional to make money it's hardly an over-reaction to take action to secure their livelihood.

"many games have yet to push graphics and gameplay quality"

You think they actually give a shit about her or her game? You think this is some sort of statement? No, they do it because they can, it takes barely any time or effort, and no one really gives a shit. They would just laugh at you for taking it so seriously assuming they even remember.

If it comes to that Sony will be the one suffering, assuming they try to match MS' hardware. Sony isn't in the position to take the type of losses that MS is able and willing to sustain in order to secure their place. If MS gets serious about entering a price war, the current Sony won't be able to keep up.

Realism in BF3 is only thrown out there when DICE can't be bothered to properly balance their game, which is almost always.

Because it's not integrated with the home console. From MS' demo the functionality isn't as comprehensive as the U controller. Your phone or tablet can do it, the console can't. There is also no standard for which peripheral is compatible so even if the console could keep up the software can only take advantage of the