My guess is that Megan will leave Don and he will end up with Peggy at the very end of the series, a la the real life Draper Daniels and Myra Janco Daniels. But I've been wrong so many times before that I don't really put much confidence in that.
But that's a capital cost, not an operating expense. You should at least amortize it by your actuarial life expectancy.
Just don't say "I want to pay for your vagina".
He will cut a bitch.
I tried to give her half the winnings but she wouldn't take them.
You'll have to wire $1000 to my accountant in Nigeria first so that he can set up the paperwork.
Maybe I'll put it in her brownie.
When I turned 18 I was away at boarding school. Went with a friend to buy a lottery ticket each. I was the heir to millions and she was the child of a public school teacher there on scholarship. I won $100 and she won nothing.
If Intrade offered a contract on this I would buy.
When my wife went to see a lawyer when we were negotiating our prenup, the (female) experienced family law lawyer had a box of tissues ready for all the tears she was going to be shedding, and was quite surprised she wasn't unhappy about having to make one.
I voted. So did my penis.
Not my field of expertise, but the Chinese are shooting for a CEP of 50m, which is what the Pershing II had. See [blog.usni.org]
Thanks. I appreciate your maturity on this, which is all too rare around here.
Just no. Sorry. SCOTUS specifically said that "The expatriating acts specified in § 349(a) cannot be treated as conclusive evidence of the indispensable voluntary assent of the citizen. The trier of fact must, in the end, conclude that the citizen not only voluntarily committed the expatriating act prescribed in the…
That is not true. You can have your citizenship cancelled if you obtained it under false pretenses. But once you have it rightfully, the government can't take it away unless you intended to give it away. See the cases of Afroyim v. Rusk and Vance v. Terrazas.
You raise an interesting, almost epistemological, question about who is the giver and who is the receiver in a tittyfuck.
42 senators (including Amy Kloubchar and Dianne Feinstein) wrote a letter last year to Holder complaining that the DOJ isn't prosecuting enough adult porn. Sadly this isn't just Rick Santorum's obsession. [www.politico.com]
"For sexual acts that involve a giver and a receiver, value should be defined according to enjoyment as experienced on the receiving end. So, for example, is entirely possible that an individual may not enjoy performing top-seeded Oral Sex, but that he or she very much likes to receive it."
But have you gotten a bronze medal at the Maccabiah Games in any table-based sports?