LazyHippo
LazyHippo
LazyHippo

Yes, it is unclear if we are supposed to value them on a single-incident basis or a have/never have again basis. I mean, I would value almost any given sex act over a bag of Reece's Pieces, but I would definitely trade cowgirl in order to avoid never having them ever again.

I need clarification on voting! I am a straight man. I don't have tits. It is impossible for me to be the recipient of a tittyfucking. Also, for anal, do I have to vote based on being pegged, and for hangnail fingerband, do I have to vote based on getting it in the rear? And since I've never been with a squirter, how

That is a revolting thought, almost up there with the Santorum cocktail that was on here a couple of days ago.

It's actually spelled cuckquean.

The South will rise again.

Damn Tigran mothers.

Under rule 12(K)1b of the 2012 DNC, a candidate must "have demonstrated a commitment to the goals and objectives of the Democratic Party as determined by the National Chair and will participate in the Convention in good faith" in order to have their delegates seated. This rule has been used before to keep out Lyndon

As a (male) Harvard grad under the new dispensation, I think it worked pretty well. Harvard couldn't have gone co-ed on its own, it needed the Radcliffe houses because it didn't have the option Columbia had to buy up the surrounding neighborhood in the 1960s. The Radcliffe Institute does wonderful stuff for gender

Actually, as of 1999, Harvard and Radcliffe fully merged, and female students now receive the same Harvard diplomas as male students do. Radcliffe was transformed into an institute of advanced study, with no undergraduate role.

Bill Clinton, on race issues if not gender ones?

This is not true. I am rich and I have no doubt that I am. Most of the other rich people I know know they are rich. It is a particular type of asshole rich person who doesn't. Unfortunately that type is very common.

I've considered that, but I still think it's a natural tendency on their part. I know other fantastically rich people like them, who because they scrimp on some costs (like driving to Canada with the dog on the roof rather than renting a second car, for example) think they aren't rich.

Yes, it's the emotional depreciation section of the 1040-SAD.

Not a bad point, actually.

She's in the pink unapproved comments complaining "I don't use words like "f——- up." It you want to quote me, at least get it right."

Have you finished writing your letter to the Holocaust Museum complaining that they are not disgusted by the Nazis yet?

The Harlingford Hotel in Cartwright Gardens meets those requirements, and the location is great. More than that I venture not to say.

Sir John Soane's Museum and Sigmund Freud's house are two small museums of surpassing interest and weirdness, and should not be missed. After the Freud museum you can walk to Louis Patisserie, an old Eastern European style bakery with great strudel, in keeping with the Viennese thing yet somehow very London. Greenwich