This is not 28 days later zombies... this is the beetles from the Mummy zombies, or the smoke monster from lost zombies.
This is not 28 days later zombies... this is the beetles from the Mummy zombies, or the smoke monster from lost zombies.
I was excited until I read how they were executing this. So horrible.
Interesting- just wanted to know where you thought the main differences were- I never completed NV because at the time I had just finished Fallout 3, and just kind of got tired of the series in general, wanted something fresh.
I loved both, but I'm curious- what did NV have that Fallout 3 didn't?
I liked her in SGU! Think she'll make a great addition the the Marvel Film-a-verse!
I definitely like the aspect of less ads, but my theory is that if enough to G+, they'll get ads just like FB.
Really? Is Google+ still a thing?
Some avengers crossover plot? I don't know... maybe we'll find out in 'Winter Soldier'
So basically they would pull a Star Trek 2009?
Well I'm 27, but would still sigh at that.
Dude... chill out- I JUST said that I enjoyed the film, don't have an aneurysm.
No, you're right... people already know Jean and Scott, so them showing up as toddlers to fight the future will make total sense and no one will be confused at all.
You're right that expectations are the leading cause of disappointment for movie-goers. For the record I DID enjoy first class (even though the geek in my was screaming in agony at times) - but I still think there is too much wrong with the film continuity to do "Days" properly.
The problem with introducing Cyclops, Storm, Jean, etc. is most of them either don't exist yet or are toddlers. Even if let's say they skip 10 years from the last film- they will still be only pre-teens.
I don't think the new X-Men film will be awesome at all. Why? They don't have all the ingredients to make "Days of Future Past" work. Half the characters don't exist yet, and none of the X-men films have delivered the kind of depth required for a story like that.
True enough, and one of Whedon's themes seems to be traditional roles of gender and sexuality get a bit fuzzy when supernatural elements are at play. Or maybe they were fuzzy to begin with, one of the two.
The embarrassment of that username must have increased drastically after the season finale...
For a while I was using a username that had in it, the full name of the once popular rock band "Hoobastank". After 2004 passed, I regretted this decision.
Lorne works in show business, is a snappy dresser, owned a karoke bar, and goes around singing showtunes... while his sexuality was never openly discussed he did sure fit a certain kind of stereotype.
I think you would have been barking up the wrong tree anyway.