Let me first say that I understand where you are coming from and that you make a good argument. I'm all for interior space, power, and versatility, but I've always preferred short-wheelbase, nimble little cars to anything else. In my top ten list of dream cars are (let me just double check my list to be sure): 1) a…

If this were a car and not an SUV, I'm sure it would be a massive hit. The look is definitely nice, and I see more Stratos in this than I probably should. I just wish it was smaller.

I wish kinja would have let me log in before now, but whatever. Here's an ad I found on Craigslist awhile back, copy pasted for your enjoyment.

I vote Nice Price.

Sir Alec Issigonis would applaud you if he was still alive. Instead, I shall do so on his behalf.

Oh, see, the name is the only part I like. Aston wants to build a tiny, ugly (in my opinion) city car? It only makes sense to name it after a baby swan. It really is the Ugly Duckling of the Aston lineup.

The one just to the far side of entrant #76? I think that's another E-Type. I looks very similar to the red Jag just right and down from center, at any rate. The wheel arch and surrounding bodywork is different, but that's about it to my eye.

Oh, and can anyone tell me what's just to this side of the Alpine in the top right?

It's strange looking here and being able to recognize most of these cars.

Why are all the "more accurate" tweets by guys named Matt? [Scrolls to top of page.]

I just wanted to take a moment to point out that the son in question wasn't necessarily inexperienced, and that even if he was, that doesn't make him unskilled.

That photo reminds me of the Ford GT ad from awhile back. There was a caption that read: "Clearly a professional driver on a closed track." Thank you, ad caption man/woman, for understanding that we aren't oblivious to everything. If only others would follow suit.

I think her face at 0:50 says it all. That says arousal more than assault, I think.