LGBT, LGBTQ, LGBTQIA and LGBT+ are all acceptable. Transgender is definitely still a word we use. I don't identify as a third gender. I'm a woman.

That mobile cell phone system though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSM

Yeah, I often see LGBTIA, and we use sexual minorities or SekuMai in Japanese. But GSM itself. GSM though makes me think of cell phones: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSM

I'll be honest... there were a couple of terms my senior year in college when I could have used a hug from a creepy chair person... I was hugging myself like Gollum in LOTR, asking myself why it cries, precious.

I think that's pretty legit. If it were a rare exception, it might not be worth being upset over, but with bi erasure very much the norm right these days... absolutely no arguments here.

It may be petty, but as a bisexual (in case there's anyone left on here who didn't already know that about me!), I feel kind of left out by organizations that choose to use the specific words 'gay' and 'lesbian' in their names. :\

His claim that virgins who wait until marriage and are faithful are not at risk for STDs is pretty much correct (you could get scabies from a gym towel, I suppose).

However, the message he's tacitly sending with that claim - that people who contract STDs deserve them because God is punishing them for sinful behavior -…

Yeah, sorry to agree with someone from Duck Dynasty, but if two people without STDs get together, stay together and don't mess around with anyone else, they're not gonna contract an STD. All that biblically correct rhetoric is infuriating, but his point is valid.

Yes, but a) marriage has nothing to do with it and b) Actual biblical sex is pretty damn kinky and involves mistresses and lot's of stuff that will absolutely get you an STI. So... his science is right but his religion is wrong, surprisingly.

He has a lot of wrong and terrible opinions and the delivery is, well, off, but the fact is — two virgins who marry and then only have sex [ed to add: Duck Dynasty/Duggar Family/extreme(myopic) Bible interpreted sex: no kissing before marriage sex] with each other ever and ever for always til death do they part will…

I understand the desire to hate the guy but he didn't say anything wrong. The delivery was poor but what is actually "nonsensical" about it?

Biblical sex, ie. between a male virgin and female virgin who are monogamous...Will probably not have STDs. I mean, how?

There's a reason Seth Meyers has a "Fake or Florida" bit on his show.

That's why I didn't post a picture!

Cool, I'm not going to have nightmares about that fucking doll chair or anything

"Don't you just hate it when people are fucking in your castle and you can't do anything about it because you're staying in one of your other castles?"

FYI for ESL people: "randos" is a slang term for "Prince Harry"