I haven’t, but that seems to be a completely minuscule opinion, and one you’ve given no context. A few people don’t like all the games which are considered by everyone else to be gaming’s best contributions.
I haven’t, but that seems to be a completely minuscule opinion, and one you’ve given no context. A few people don’t like all the games which are considered by everyone else to be gaming’s best contributions.
Maybe some day stores will actually keep digital records of their inventory. I feel like that might be more appropriate than having a to take a digital tour of the store.
I actually kind of feel that way. Except that the main problem is having to pay $800 for the goggles, and finding another person on the planet who you find enjoyable and is dumb enough to buy $800 glasses.
Why would they make a set of the villages? To me, that’s the laziest and most disappointing part of the game. They all look the same, except for generating mistakes like lava in the middle of the road, houses with the front door hanging off a cliff, etc.
I am offended by this flagrant display of female-ness and the possession of a butt.
You better meow, bitch.
Nobody complained in what way? I always thought this kind of thing was cringe-worthy, but 11 year old me wasn’t going to look up the publisher’s address and send them a letter. The only people in the media interested in video games in 1998 were people like Joseph Lieberman and that disbarred Florida ambulance chaser.
Uh, no. It was all done by progressives in the media, not keyboard warriors on the internet, and not by art student losers in dreadlocks talking about “cultural appropriation, man”.
Getting upset at someone saying ‘I agree with that’ makes you sound like a moron. Nobody is impressed that you consider yourself an adult now.
Because they want the game to be weird. They want you to compare breast and penis sizes. They want the prejudices one assigns to character design to be totally out of the player’s hands. Because people find unity or rivalry in looking similar or different.
There’s thousands of games they can do that in. Let them eat dick.
Oh great Garen, mark my enemy as the villain and spin upon him vigorously.
Example: You kill a man, his son grows up to seek vengeance, he kills your family. Your fault for killing his dad.
In practice, you destabilise a region, you take responsibility for what that instability leads to. The amount of time that’s passed is completely immaterial, it’s still the result of what the US has set…
Right, buddy, there are no bad ideas. Interesting analysis. A bad idea has something to do with morality. Check.
Feeding my stance back to me is a great way to look reasonable.
I think it’s whatever player they’re using.
Oh, good, more stalking features. Thanks, modern gaming platforms, for letting everyone know my business at all times.
One thing to note is that they seem to put minimal effort into WoW. Most of it’s art direction and ameteur writing. They’ve got 6 million players at any one time, which is at least 72 million A MONTH. There’s no way server costs are leaching ONE BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR. It’s still their most profitable business.…
Oh, I conflated your comment with someone else’s.
Probably because with those numbers, it was starting to look like competition.
You know there were 2 expansions before that, right?