Kittens22
Kittens22
Kittens22

But it’s not the WoW experience currently offered. All of that is still in the $12+ a month version of the game, though watered down, but a vanilla version doesn’t have any of the new items or progression. Such a version would just be for people who like the same old thing that they played 10 years ago.

If it really

Harm to the overall franchise is changing everything about the way the game’s played to attract more than 10 active players paying over $12 a month and thus alienating most of them.

Really, what did they accomplish by making the game less complicated and somehow even more grindy (though easier to get rewards if you’re

Are you serious? The point is, running around and ousting and installing governments over money is a bad idea. It hurts people, and it can lead to unforeseen consequences of varying intensity. Pretty sure this is covered pretty regularly on Curious George. Might want to check out some children’s stories on how

Looks like Trump got his GamerGate endorsement.

Honestly, they haven’t told a good story since KOTOR. They lost their groove after they decided to recycle the same storyline from that game into their own IP.

I think what they really need to do is make Star Trek games. Would be better than most of the shows.

All of these games look identical.

I am, though I was a bit disappointed by Pillars of Eternity. Gameplay’s too simple for such a complicated D&D-like gameplay premise.

I’m pretty sure it is. There’s nothing butt centric about that pose. She’s looking over her shoulder. She has long legs. Have you seen a woman with long legs look over her shoulder before? Her ass kind of goes crazy. It’s physics. Butt based physics.

Nice back peddling, butt hater.

No they aren’t.. Most of their games are top down perspective.

What’s logical about “aaah! there’s a butt on that person’s body!”

And then every other time tracer or another character move they’ll have to consider if it’s showing too much.

You should move to Saudi Arabia. No butts or democracy.

Seems more like they’re freaking out that one person complained.

Having a butt isn’t objectification. The butt isn’t the point of her pose. It’s just her LOOKING OVER HER SHOULDER.

It’s funny, though. it shows how ass-backwards people are when it comes to interpreting storytelling in video games. If a book had shown you that, you’d interpret that the author wanted you to know who was going to be in this chapter for some reason.

MGS1 wasn’t composed by a single person. Harry Gregson-Williams is one of the most famous contemporary composers in the world, especially for media. The theme song to MGS2 is known to people who don’t even play video games.

People buy YouTube fodder if it looks like fun — As for Stanley, there’s no coherent story to be had, it’s more analogous to a piece of modern art than a movie.

If you’ve seen a story once, you’ve already had the whole experience. Why buy it? If you’re one of those people who likes to see the same content a few times

Welcome to video games. We have things like Dragon’s Lair, L.A. Noire, Another World/Out of This World, Heavy Rain, The Walking Dead, Final Fantasy 7-10... which are barely interactive stories. It’s not okay to steal them just because you erroneously believe that interactive stories are some kind of new and disturbing

YouTubers have NO RIGHT to make let’s plays which profit on giving away the entirety of an experience. At least something like a 30 minute video of Ark or a full 26 hour series on a game that’s been out for a year - those are ways of promoting and remarketing the product. But to steal someone’s work in entirety, such