That’s the stupid part of all of this. By investigating every claim, they’re setting themselves up to violate a bunch of other laws. The complaining parents should need to come with something more substantial than “she doesn’t look feminine” for the association to even think about looking into it. 

Yeah, makes sense. Because getting the stars to do those hundreds of inane interviews is how the studio gets the media to write glowing reviews of their latest movie, which hopefully will get the opening week box office high enough so that the movie makes money before the terrible word of mouth starts getting out…

This is an entirely predictable result. The same crowd that is always railing against participation trophies is now using anti-trans bigotry to try to disqualify cis girls so their precious little Beckys and Susies don’t feel bad when they get beat.

Control of the Senate is more important, especially since 2024 is a bad map for Democrats - defending 23 of 33 seats up for election (including independents Angus King and Bernie Sanders). Also Sinema and Manchin are up that year, hopefully they can primary Sinema with a better Democrat, but WV almost certainly goes…

I read that clause as more him thinking he was legally covering himself so she couldn’t claim to be under the influence of something, it included alcohol and drugs as well as foods with aphrodisiac qualities. Like a court would be totally unable to see the obvious coercion of signing a contract under duress, and buy…

rechazar - to reject, decline

Isn’t T.I. the dude that said he takes his teenage daughter to the gynecologist to have her hymen checked? Talk about an unwarranted violation of personal space...

First of all, the dude from the Chainsmokers didn’t lock lips with T.I., he kissed him on the cheek. And I agree consent should be obtained before kissing someone, but you just made my point for me. You wouldn’t punch a woman who did that, regardless of consent. And presumably, neither would T.I.

As a dad myself, I’d just like to say fuck Matthew Yglesias NOT gently with a chainsaw for his tone deaf tweet. Some of us were smart enough to realize the Republicans were actively working to take away the rights of everyone who’s not a cishet white male (a category which I fall into) for YEARS. 

I didn’t say they should. I’m asking the OP whether the boldface ANYBODY catching hands includes women. Call me crazy, but I think the response might be a bit different based on who is kissing them without permission.

Seems pretty obvious, they can track whether you leave the state despite signing for the in-state rate, locate/immobilize the car if the renter reports it stolen, etc.

So if a woman kisses you on the cheek without asking you’re popping her in the mouth?

Even worse is the idea that they would be in the majority party and thus have actual influence on legislation. At least currently, MTG and Boebert are basically irrelevant and reduced to “introducing articles of impeachment” against Biden, Garland, and Fauci every other week.

Honestly, this is the kind of content that probably SHOULD be a slideshow, as opposed to the listicle type posts that usually get converted to slideshows. The title of each slide could be the character the cosplayer is dressed as.

Dave Bautista (Drax in Guardians of the Galaxy/MCU) is famous among his former wrestling colleagues for having a big dick.

“I’d” can also be a contraction for “I would” or “I should”, so the phrase might have been “if I would have used all of them”. There’s nothing wrong with the clarification.

According to the reports I’ve seen, she gained 30 pounds for each of the first two Bridget Jones movies, which is pretty significant.

I expect that her replacement will be worse.

I fully support him being petty, but at least own that shit. “Don’t serve her here, there, or there - it’s totally up to you otherwise” when that leaves like maybe one or two options.

Or else what? Your kid gets kicked out of the school (assuming it’s a private school)?