He/she/they are probably by far the comments I most star. Whit on tap.
Kimithechamp
Kimithechamp
I’m not sure you can make this argument, at least not well.
It’s a bit like saying just because some of the youngs struggle with rotary phones they must also suck at all phones and definitely the latest iPhone.
How could his operation of basic airplanes possibly disqualify him from piloting some of the fastest…
I’m anti-union. I won’t waste your time :)
I’m looking forward to it.
Counterpoint, we need to get these pedestrians in more trucks and SUV’s.
Oh baby, this thread is sure to deliver
Sounds awesome
Jalopnik Take
Michigan residents + wanting to use boats with motors or buy paint at stores that sell paint and groceries = raging asshole lunatics who should be put down
NYC residents + wanting to close 90% of city streets to vehicles = smart, responsible, oppressed people under the thumb of stupid incompetence
Double LOL
LOL
Kind of disappointed how far I had to scroll in the comments to get to this take. This is quite possibly the worst chase to try to make the argument with. A car which is arguably incapable of high speeds is chased by cops nowhere to be seen through highways that are mostly wide open at speeds which appear appropriate…
Oh, so you want me to believe the general denigration of people flying that is so rampant around Jalop/Giz is really about that lack of innovation in aviation technology? Or is it that, by reducing our use of flying to get around we’ll spur innovation? Is that how it worked for air conditioning, people quit using it…
...has refused to give workers paid sick leave...
Welcome to Jalopnik, where the proliferation of people moving about the world is seen as a very very bad thing.
I think you all (Fuel_of_Satan included) have missed this part (which is the most important part):
It’s the dealers. fault 100%
Dang, just barely in to the article I thought “Oh, I should make some smart-ass joke about blaming Capitalism/late-stage Capitalism (soo in right now!)/corporations and then thought “nah, why be a douche when you don’t need to be?” But then boom! “Big Pigmant”! Yikes! Then followed by “status”, eek!
Presuming it was…
Just think how jealous the Soviets would’ve been!
So, in your correction you incorrectly state the article phrased it as a ban on fishing, which it did not [my apologies if they revised their article afterward without noting it had been updated from an earlier version], and then in your explanation to someone regarding the subject you phrased it yourself as “restricti…