Science deniers are not the target audience. They have zero motivation to watch any show that will attempt to change their minds - the confirmation bias is way too strong to allow that. How do I know this? Despite an entire Internet filled with actual real facts, they continue to deny reality. That takes some effort.

.

The headline says Apple bricked the phones. The article seems to be saying something different - that the user bricked the phone, and Apple is refusing to service that bricking due to the user’s earlier (and otherwise unrelated) third party repair of a broken screen.

Superior to most shows on the CW.

So much this.

Averted != proven wrong. Crack a book.

Where’s the CSI “Enhance” button when you need it?

So.. Intel then?

Actual facts: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/which-states-are-givers-and-which-are-takers/361668/

They are all uncut.

“And why, if there was a real Eleanor out there, we hadn’t seen who Jason had accidentally replaced.”

“I voted for Obama both times, he doubled the debt in those eight years. Wake the fuck up.”

This just in: senators frequently bring in large poster cards just like this with charts, quotes, figures, etc. Sanders isn’t doing anything odd by printing this on a placard and showing it on the floor.

A fine one to end on.

Gawk is not spelled h-e-l-p. :)

There can absolutely be a distinction. It is likely illegal for a (used car) dealer to sell a car in that condition, registration or no registration. If that’s the case, then a reasonable definition of “operable” would therefore likely exclude this vehicle.

I can’t answer your question but feel compelled to complement your choice of nickname anyways.

“the first fully CG character ever”

That was brilliant.

On the Nintendo Switch: “We’re hopeful that by aiming their 3DS and set-top development power at a single platform”