I'm going to put this as simply as possible: Schools. Schools?

Am I serious that "a guy once tried to use handsoap as lube for anal sex" is not an example of a thing that public schools should have to worry about correcting? What are you asking me, exactly?

I rarely dismiss comments, but irredeemable trolling is irredeemable trolling.

Actually, you didn't put it up. I put it up. I typed the words and I clicked "publish" and I came back in a couple of hours to read your outrage. Your role in it was simply to set yourself up for the bashing, walk right into it, and then get your head in a knot over it.

Why would I be mad? Society literally agrees that I'm a better and more important person than you just by virtue of who I am. It pays me more and it respects the things I say more. I was trying to make a joke with other readers of the site, but I'll just go back to enjoying my incredible delicious privilege. Just by…

Not necessarily, but it would be a much more interesting and probably more productive dialogue if that were an option that was actually taken seriously. Arguably the colonial powers could have had one before the colonial period started (because at this point it's way too late for that to be responsible option).…

I'm not sure how this relates to donation in asymmetrical economies as a market pressure.

Of course consumers can't really be judged for this, because everyone has needs and wants and everyone wants a good deal or a cool product. I mean everyone should purchase ethically but there are massive limits to this (not least of which is the feasibility of alternatives and actual knowledge of what broader concerns…

What?

That's interesting, and sounds like it puts more than nothing into the local economy, but it still sounds like it could artificially disadvantage existing clothing makers and retailers.

I know, dude, we fucking suck.

I wrote another post in this thread explaining what the actual argument for "why not," is, because there is one. Would be interested in knowing what you think if you read it, if you've got the time/are interested.

I totally agree with you about that. It's a big sad face with a question mark.

Thank you. And I think you're probably right about that.

Who do you work for, so we can all collectively boycott you and anyone you supply, and mail you bags of dogshit, you petty crybaby cunt-flexing son of a whore that raped an underage quadriplegic and then died shitting you out of the dirty hole created when her pussy and ass tore together into one giant pit of…

Let's kick his fucking ass.

I'd be interested (if you have the time and desire) if you'd read my other comment in this thread and tell me what you think about it.

I sincerely wonder about what the right thing to do here is. It always sounds like a great idea to send people in need free stuff, but there are things that once you know you can't un-know about the accidental fallout of it.

Would watch. At work. Wanna tell me the thrust of it?

EDIT: Nevermind, watched without sound. Honest to god, this is how devoid of a sense of humor you and five other people are? Really? Did you just skip to the end of the comment? Or were you already angry and defensive when you came to it?

A man has to work at a carefully crafted career of political missteps and gaffes, to be a disingenuous shark among disingenuous sharks, near the top of the country that against all odds and reasonable logic believes itself to be the best in the world, to be hand-picked by party machinery not for his contributions to…