Male privilege is still a male centric scapegoat for bad behavior. And that's my only point, that personal responsibility should be the greater focus of individual behavior.

It's still MLB's game. You're more than welcome not to watch if you don't want to, if you care enough about PED use to do something about it. And if the argument is that the PED use of these guys literally saved the game then I'm not sure that's an argument against it.

He made a grammatical error on the internet . . . . burn him! Their, there, they're it will be alright.

I made a joke . . . don't be afraid.

Well, no and yes. Obviously getting into the hall isn't a right. Banishment is the death sentence. But the only people up until this discussion to not get in the hall based on something other than their numbers were people who were properly banished. So they do sort of walk hand in hand. No one denied player x…

I may be the devil . . . I'm not sure.

I know what I'm having for dinner ..... a salad. Badabump.

I'll give you this last one even though I said I wouldn't feed you and your need to insult anymore.

Certainly I don't think we should ignore that outside forces can and do influence our behavior. At the same time, though, we're in control of our behavior certainly more than we are in control of the system. Recognizing our own behavior and changing it individually is much more possible than trying to change the…

I've had maple glazed long johns with bacon bits on top. Well, I've had one once. Not actually all that good. A little bit of trying to put too much together. Besides, bacon bits are a disappointment compared to a full strip.

2. That doesn't really fit with the point I was trying to make and it's also a little bit of a cute statement. Cheating is important otherwise they wouldn't have rules at all. But cheating also doesn't mean an automatic death sentence from the sport and everything that goes with it.

Well, I think it starts with the fact that you didn't respond to my first point. You decided to comment on something I said to someone else. But as we bantered a little (and I thought we were being playful "darling" and "willfully obtuse" etc) you very quickly decided to call me a troll. Pulled that trigger really…

And that's what I'm talking about. That boss shouldn't be failed to be recognized for that asshole he is and was and for how he fed the situation. But at the end of the day that woman also had a choice on how to behave. Implying that the bigger problem was external means that as a person she's incapable of making…

Ok, so should we retroactively find out who popped greenies and other stimulants to perform better and stay at peak level more often and kick them out? Sure it may not be to the same extent but its still using drugs to perform better. And what about all those white HOFers who's numbers and membership in the Hall are…

Lol - that's all my wife seems to notice too. Whatever keeps her happy.

2. Of course you can't prove a negative. So you can't prove Piazza used PEDs if he didn't. But if Cal Ripken did and we didn't know about it we may be able to. I'd argue that logic would tell us that somewhere along the way a percentage of people in the Hall cheated on the field, we just don't know about it. …

No. But I can see the need for you to label me as one. It's easier for you.

It's relying on that as an excuse or crutch or get off lightly for poor personal behavior.

Actually I was wondering if there wouldn't be a "what are you doing" article here on Jezebel if she wore something unflattering. Sometimes there's just no winning.

And if all the backup dancers were white then she'd still be racist.