Kaizen626
Kaizen626
Kaizen626

The more I see of this game, the more I think of how bad and janky it all looks. Dont get me wrong, rendering an “open world” like Fallouts is much different than a single player game, but Bioshock Infinite blows this game out of the water graphically and came out in like, 2011, on old hardware. Those textures are

I dont get the hate. You'd need a powerful PC upwards of $1000 to buy this thing and use it as intended. Some people spend that much on nice monitors with a high refresh rate. This is more than a display, but it OS a display, and people spend that much on a display anyhow. If $600 is too much, you probably wanted to

Cumberbatch is a big name actor. He gets people in the seats. He has played imposing villains before. People were hyped to see him in the role because of this.

They could have gotten a Sikh to play Khan, but then Im sure in some corner of the internet people would be complaining about it always needing to be a Middle

“I can’t mount a film of this budget, where I have to rely on tax rebates in Spain, and say that my lead actor is Mohammad so-and-so from such-and-such. I’m just not going to get it financed. So the question doesn’t even come up.

He didn’t say “this list is shit because Witcher 3 isn’t on it” he said HE couldn’t imagine making a list like this and not including Witcher, which means HE would have to include Witcher, not that Fahey.

I would have loved to see a “worst shotgun list” to coincide with this. Shall we start one?

Obi Wan also did some “unfwir” things that aren't morally right to get what he needed. It's not a matter of if you consider Qui Gons actions to be dickish, he was doing them to a SLAVE TRADER for God sake. Why should we feel bad for Watto?

I think the problem people have with this movie is there is definitely a lot of vague, unbelievable crap that people either A.) Have to look past and buy into, or B.) There is an explanation for in extended materials (Like the EU and press interviews).

This movie is enjoyable, but hoaky as fuck. I mean, there are so

Butts

Another pessimistic post from Lozzle, contributing nothing. I mean, its obvious you dont know the pedigree of the people making this, or that a LOT of early access games that get to the top of the steam lists get finished. Its the ones that dont catch on with the community that usually dont get finished.

But please,

Careful, you might cut yourself on that EDGE

I’ll consider battlefield 4 a multi-player only title for these purposes since everyone knew the campaign was gonna be BAD and everyone plays Bf For the multi-player anyhow. That and Titan fall were the last two MP games I bought for $60, because both were fun for a bit and then wanted to charge for map packs

I’d say the value of a multi-player game comes down to its fun factor, which adds to the longevity. I’d say there are probably equal amounts of games where people go back and play the campaign multiple times through as there are multi-player games that harvest a community that lasts for a really long time. The

Using the biggest franchise on the planet in COD as a measuring stick for what console games people stick with is pretty disingenuous. How about some less huge titles. People still playing those?

It's reasonable to spend full price on a multi-player game people are going to play for a while. It's not to pay for a multi-player game people are going to get tired of over the course of a few months. You got YEARS of value out of UT if you wanted to. Battlefront costs $110 for everything and people will be done

This. Every other aspect of her costume and portrayal is just as potentially offensive as the butt slap if not more so, so what does removing the butt slap accomplish? As we have stated, we can stop pretending the butt slap solely would push a game into an M rating from a T rating, so the ratings element is out of it

You know how this site loves to skewer older (usually conservative) people for talking down to other generations about stuff they usually dont understand or a joke they arent in on/take too seriously? That is you right now, Madeline. Perhaps towel off and take a cold shower and come back and try again later.

Please, cite these huge sales numbers for AAA turn based games and see if they would be enough for a massive company like Square to consider a success. They’re looking for Tomb Raider level sales with this. Games on this development budget have to make A LOT to break even, so I think going mass market only makes sense

Really? Cuz I’m pretty sure the mostmore people have been asking for an ff7 remake since after 10 was released. There is catering to dedicated fans then there is looking at what is going to sell most and more people remember and have asked for a 7 remake than a remake of 6 so they met a middle ground for dedicated

“Wait, is that a thin Clark Kent-look alike on the cover of the Gotham Free Press? Or that skinny criminal Batman tied up in the SDCC trailer? That’s weird.