Kaizen626
Kaizen626
Kaizen626

Wow. And you saw what they were trying to do. You're an adult. This game is for other adults. Newsflash, the game can still exist, and you can still not like it, without people calling for it to not be made. It's hilarious. Content people don't agree with, and don't have to view, should be limited as to how widely

Your cynicism is palpable. Thank you for deciding what is cool and edgy for all of us. So glad you and Kotaku can do that for us. Any other vague, subjective terms you'd like to place in a nice little conditioned box for us there Stalin?

It's people's weak mental state. They've been conditioned that murder is only ok if a game if there is a certain condition, like desperation, or humor. Your character was being threatened by murder, so murder is justified. Your character isn't supposed to be taken serious, so murder is justified. How about being

valve not allowing this on Greenlight isn't censorship, it isn't violating the first amendment. Valve has the power to put up whatever it wants. But what Valve is doing, is entirely lame. Greenlight exists for fans to be able to get games published they are interested in. Despite the content, and the "outrage" some

Christ. It's such a shame that the real discussion is labeled with this whole attitude of "men are allowed to look, women arent". It's not like men made up that rule. It's something that varies from person to person. I know I've had both girlfriends who want you not to look and don't care. it's as if she's suggesting

"For clarity's sake: Putting a round through the skull of a long-term enemy in a narrative-driven game—or even killing a persistent enemy who has no narrative background, but won't stop trying to shoot you—it a far cry from strolling up to a civilian, with no connection to the violence of the player character, and

The presence of other options doesnt negate the fact that, at some point, both games are very good murder simulators.

"rebelling against some nebulous incarnation of The Man"

This line attempts to discredit that there is some sort of "man" to stand up against at all. Thats not true. The Man, in this case, is all of the negative press this game is being fed. Its giving them attention. And whats more, while they may seem to be

Congrats to all the hard core who can spot the difference between this and SF4. doesnt really mean they don't look way too damn similar. The models are in the same vein, if not the exact same modelling technique and style. It's easy to see where they were derived from. The small changes to lighting and what not won't

Me too, but on a website that's all about drumming up hysterics to get readers, nothing is ever good enough.

And she didn't ask for anything beyond them taking her complaint seriously, which they did and fired the guy. As much as people want to make it seem like they could have done more, they aren't required to, and this whole "better screening" idea is great, so long as we're all sure they don't already screen and

at least this user rep pretended to give a fuck, gave a "we'll look into it" and gave an apology. I don't see how Uber is responsible beyond that. Giving her cab fare back was nice, since she didn't ask for anything besides they read her letter and take it seriously. If the author was expecting to infuriate by

He could be a sociopath...or he could have grown up in a neighborhood completely different from your, im sure, secure and white community. Im sure you know the kind of shit he had to see every day. Im sure murder was never far from his mind. And maybe, he also has no sympathy for someone who would kill themselves and

You might see the confusion in your want to "logically question what type of role Floyd played" after your first rant in which you finished with the phrase "Fuck Floyd and fuck anyone that defends him."...that doesnt seem like youve already made up your mind about someone at all...My fault. There was obviously tons of

Dont be stupid. People rap about killing people and rape and all kinds of horrible behavior all the time, and it doesnt mean they go out and kill people or rape people. So, a song from 2010, is supposed to be a huge warning sign and indicator of the entirety of this guys personality? No, I think not.

Also, you assume

Wow. Even if he is insinuating "you gonna let her do you like that?" he is talking about HER cheating on HIM, and that he should LEAVE her. Not kill her. He thinks he's a coward for being weak to stay with a cheater. If a woman was being cheated on by a man, I bet a similar thing would be said to the woman about

Ya this isn't reality, this is just your judgement. This is why judgemental hystericals aren't who decide who is responsible in a court of law, thank God. Go put your touch out.

It's insensitive because so many people would be damaged, so he must be to blame in at least some way right? That's pretty much what the article insinuates anyhow. I'm glad hysterical, click baiting journalists aren't part of th legal system.

Nice article. A domestic abuser suggests a guy leave a woman because it's bad for his career, and somehow it's insinuated he made the situation worse. Saying you should leave a girlfriend =/= you should beat her and/or murder her.

puke.