Kaizen626
Kaizen626
Kaizen626

I think we can agree that yes, women are marginalized in their depiction in games, and they are very much underrepresented in gaming in general, both as characters and as developers....but what I laugh about is that, since ive been following gaming, there have been MORE strong women characters, and greater

Your all encompassing, general statement seems to have many a whole in its logic. Who'da thunk it?

It is plain FACT that men greatly outnumber women in STEM jobs. IDK what you want people to do except look at the numbers. Why women dont get into more STEM like areas isnt the problem of the employer, they still have a workforce full of men to do the work they need done. They arent going to go out and make it a

Thank you. Exactly what the EA exec said. Most of the comments seem to forget that she pointed out the whole "lack of women in TECHNOLOGY jobs in general" as the problem. She says, as an exec, that there arent enough women out there to hire. And she probably knows what shes talking about as head of HR for EA than

Uh. There are plenty of women out there who complain about not having enough women in the gaming industry. Hence the response from the gaming industry. Since when was it ever "women dont know what to do with their lives"? Your comment made zero sense. If there are articles out there, being written by women, in the

If there are enough women applying and demanding jobs, it will be impossible to turn them away. Its pretty easy to turn away so few people, but not if women make developers realize, through their own effort, that women are dying to get into the industry. More numbers = more effective statement.

Uh, the HR person above said that SHE knows that there arent enough women in gaming. Its not about whos hiring them. Its about whos applying. If you immediately go, as a woman, "This field isnt going to hire me because its male dominated" youve immediately killed any hope of going into the field. Just because its a

Am I the only one with the theory that, maybe Kyle Myers, who had no power on the channel since without Ratliff he would get no guns and therefore have no show, was being ousted an/or told that he wasnt going to be the host anymore, or did something to make Ratliff stop helping him, and so he shot him? I mean, if were

Am I the only one with the theory that, maybe Kyle Myers, who had no power on the channel since without Ratliff he would get no guns and therefore have no show, was being ousted an/or told that he wasnt going to be the host anymore, or did something to make Ratliff stop helping him, and so he shot him? I mean, if were

I think every editor should do an article like this for the PS2, and possibly xbox and gamecube...but PS2 first because it was the best console last gen AND it just retired for good...finally

An apologist will tell you that personal games don't get made because not only because game development teams are so large, but also because it's difficult to propose playing as a character that may be less ‘relatable' to most players.

Every time I look at the title picture I think "why does that guy in the blue shirt have an arm twice the width of his head?"

Oh you mean, that over played song from 3 years ago? TOTALLY BRO!

No, Skrillex blows ass and you have terrible taste in music, and that scene was an abomination of "lets appeal to all the people who smoke pot" from the developers. Im glad you fell for a trick aimed at 17 year old boys at what, 20 something? 30 something? I bet you LOVED the story too....

"play it on hard" is not an excuse for a poorly executed, non scary normal mode. If they want to make a scary game, and its "scary" on hard but not on normal, then its the developers fault they shipped a lame turd of a game. And, he stated in another post, that he did play it on hard. Youz the bitch now.

damn, freak out a little bit why dont you? So he didnt get scared. You wanna like, rip him a new one for it, for saying his opinion? No, he should just shut up, because its insulting to all the other people who were scared that he wasnt, right? He stated why the game was not scary...because it was easy...and the only

Yes, he MUST BE TROLLING because his opinion of the game was different than yours and others, even though you recognize where he is coming from, because he didnt think of why it might be scary for others he is instantly a troll. Or, maybe, it was a post on a blog on the internet and you should just fuck right off and

So he should feel bad for not being scared? And by pointing out that enemies have predictable patterns that, once figured out, take away the scare factor a bit from a game he already finds not very scary? And that makes him a troll tough guy? for not being scared by a game? Im sorry, but Ive NEVER been scared by a

"turn up the difficulty" is just an excuse for a game that should be better.

Actually, the game isnt very hard on ANY difficulty, and last time I checked, a game kind of technically fails at being a "horror" game if it isnt scary under the "normal" difficulty, you know, the one where developers think is the sweet spot to play their game in? Obviously, they thought that was a good balance, but