KEWLBEAAANS
KEWLBEAAANS
KEWLBEAAANS

I know that feeling. I'm just blown away at some of the older pictures. I have large, natural breasts that I've always thought of as gross and saggy. But...Miss December 1968 has tits exactly like mine. So does Miss October 1959. You'd never see those women in a magazine today unless it was a fetish magazine and then

All other considerations aside, Terry is really a one-trick pony, isn't he? If you've seen any of his photographs, you've really seen them all.

Interesting observation. Maybe because the "softer" aesthetic was seen as the ideal in beauty then, so while not 'fat', stomachs were softer and bigger nipples also give off that 'soft' look? Now, the smaller, hard nipples go with the perky breasted and harder, defined-but-thin abs and firm butts that are seen as

I'm actually surprised that there are so many "larger" areolae in the older pictures. All the new pictures have tiny little areolae no bigger than a quarter. The older ones have bigger ones. Things like that would have been nice to see when I was a kid and thinking there was something wrong with me because my areolae

People do have differently placed nipples. Plus, she's leaning backward with her chest up, making them appear higher. Her boobs may be fake but they haven't been lifted. Lifts = serious scar tissue and I don't see Playboy ever hiring someone with a lot of scars on their breasts that they'd have to photoshop out.

Ha, based on the bio of a former Hef GF that I read the playmates are sexually harassed, just by Hef. It could be the insinuations of a former lover, but Izabella St. James hinted that any and all prospective playmates went out with the girls and Hef and ended up sleeping with him, as part of the vetting process.

Wow. So shiny. Much silicone. What flash.

I love your sources.

I assume you've not met Helmut Newton.

You must be new to boob jobs. Those girls are fake. Hence the perky nips.

Those are actually magnetic nipples and a ten-pound crane magnet is hovering just above the shot.

It's 100% a boob job. That's the way some of the worse ones (IMO) look, they put too much of the silicone cup or whatever under the natural nipple in order to make 'em look perky. Even the perkiest breasted young 'uns don't look like that. The blonde girl with the sunglasses on the right though — hers are what perky,

I would almost not mind all the outrage over his work if he was any damn good.

Well, he'll fit right into their boring aesthetic. Seriously, I'm someone who is attracted to women and a 'visual' person and these pictures do absolutely nothing for me. The women obviously have killer bodies, but their plastic, oiled-down-and-hairless-as-a-rule look combined with overexposed photos that aren't

Surgically enhanced most definitely.

All of my disdain for Terry Richardson aside, can you really be considered a "fashion" photographer if your subjects are oftentimes mostly or completely nude?

2/10 would not fap.

And I'm sure he didn't sexually harass well-known Playmates, who likely have legal representation courtesy of Hefner's empire.

Well, that's one way to reduce porn consumption, make it look wicked shitty.