I'm suddenly really aware that Dark Souls features very little fighting on elevators.

* ups the ante with Olga Flow from PSO *

So droopy... dude clearly needs MOAR HAIRSPRAY

PSO did alright and it will probably be fondly remembered long after everyone has forgotten about Dynasty.

Also hospital bills because they have to keep themselves alive in order to play games.

Or, if you want to think like someone who is more interested in games than novels, come up with interesting new genres with fun gameplay instead of making another generic FPS created entirely to demonstrate that you have the latest and greatest PC hardware. But this is Crytek we are talking to here... all they know is…

I don't think they have. I think a lot of people didn't end up playing GTA:O that much, but that's really no skin off their ass unless you were also going to buy money, and I think that was a very small portion of players who would do that.

Man... I had a 52" 480i TV back in the day. At the time it was considered awesome.

I don't have a setup issue. I perceive this effect the same way at movie theaters, and most of them have projectors that only do 24fps. It's the same using my bluray player as it is if I use my WDTV Live (which also allows me to set the frequency that it sends at). Believe me, I know what I'm doing when it comes to…

It's both actually. The whole up/down stepping thing where some frames get doubled while others get tripled is a different thing that is also annoying, but that's not a problem in my case since my television supports 24, 30, 60, and 120hz signals. (It has a 120hz refresh rate, so it just does 5x duplication per frame…

Not in 2014 it isn't. I haven't seen TVs without HDMI inputs for sale in many years now.

Just because I think something is crappy in one quality doesn't mean I completely dismiss it.

Someone missed out on the whole Peter Jackson Hobbit discussion. Yes, movie framerates are crap and you'd realize that if you ever noticed saw how choppy long camera pans across large environments are.

They you probably have a television handy already, now don't you?

Not necessarily. The problem might have been that they couldn't get 8 sets of Ice Climbers going simultaneously while still maintaining full frames and decided they cared more about 8 player smash than Ice Climbers.

*plugs into computer monitor*

That's a humorous way of putting it.

I don't count monitors into costs for PCs either. I usually keep on using my monitors through multiple PCs and only changing them when I want to upgrade something specifically about the monitor setup like getting display ports or higher resolution monitors.

Highest: $5,460. When you're buying a huge stack of games (19, to be exact), four extra controllers and a fancy new HDTV, the numbers will certainly add up against you.http://kotaku.com/how-much-money...

I have some compelling evidence that suggests that isn't the case!