JohnTChance
JohnTChance
JohnTChance

I would say in general Avatar is the most successful film that nobody is passionate about. I really don't know how these films are going to work the same magic twice, unless Cameron really has a great story up his sleeve. Also, I saw the The Core recently and "unobtanium" is a word in that movie. Cameron completely

Nice visuals ,but I got zero emotion from that. Seemed like Terminator turned into another Joseph Campbell hero's journey in space.

So they're turning Tarzan into Avatar, complete with their own version of Unobtanium.

Nolan ( and Cameron, for that matter) have their work cut out for them topping Gravity.

Is there a law that Anthony Hopkins has to be in every period movie?

The North would just cut off the water from the Owens Valley and let L.A. die of thirst. End of war.

"Enter Orson Scott Card's announcement that he'll be writing a new young adult series taking place right after Ender's Game"

Wow, I knew about the murder but not the details. Sounds like her friend could've saved her if he'd just gone outside. Imagine living with that?

I remember that article. It was written by Richard Corliss. I read it in high school and it got me so amped up for those two movies. What a great summer 1982 was.

And remember, Spielberg chose Michael Kahn to cut this instead of E.T., so you can imagine his control extended into the editing room, too.

I love this movie, but even as a kid, I never found it very scary, and I was an easily frightened child. I think it was because so much of the set up was so funny, and with Spielberg's name attached (I really had no clue then of who Hooper was), I just felt like there wasn't a real threat to the family. The movie was

A lot of people also think Spielberg directed much of Poltergeist because the compositions especially in the first two acts have the feel of his movies. Seriously, look at the suburban home scenes. Just on a visual level, do they look like anything Hooper's done before or since?

That canon instrument has a really lovely sound.

Uh....wrong. If the movie is a massive hit, his book which is already making more money as the #1 NY Times paperback bestseller, will make even more money. It will also convince studios to buy more of his work because he's now "bankable", and that the "controversy" was meaningless. He may have "got" his money (if you

"The only concern you should have regarding OSC is if the studios attempt to buy the rights to more of his books should Ender's Game be successful."

The book is #1 on the NY Times paperback bestseller list. That's all Card's money. He's already profiting off the movie.

You're putting too much stock in this movie. Whether it does well or not won't stop Hollywood's appetite for intellectual property or adapting novels to screen. That's being driven by Hunger Games and other YA books. Unless this movie does Gravity scale numbers, it's just a blip on the Hollywood map and won't affect

Wait....does Disney own the rights to future Indy movies, too? What does one have to do with the other? Also, as iconic as Ford is as INdy, I'm thinking they should reboot that character with a younger actor. Right now, every new outline of the story has to take into account Ford's age, which both limits what they can

They valud RDJ's input so much, he's allowed to play Iron Man without actually ever having to be in the Iron Man costume.

"We seem not to be very good at making small things."