That's fine you just care about those things; that's your right. However, many other gamers care about many other things and want characters to also represent themselves, not just white males...and that's their right, too.

But MANY of the "moderate" gamergaters echo the "talking points" of the gamergate "cunts" Only a few gamergaters may actually harass or threaten Sarkeesian, Quinn, and Wu; but many gamergaters continue to badmouth her on the internet, which feeds those harassing and threatening "cunts."

Go ahead, make a "level-headed criticism" against Sarkeesian. I'm sure you'll be just fine.

You're a feminist and you're a fan of Thunderfoot who actively argued that sexual harassment is NOT an issue at conferences. Yeah, you're quite the feminist.

Cultural criticism IS a valid approach and is practiced by English scholars, historians, and sociologists in universities throughout America. And Sarkeesian's arguments are sound and well-supported. If you think they aren't, you need to actually counter them with evidence yourself. Nobody will treat you as insane…

But she didn't make "dumb" arguments, and her examples and goals were valid. However, even if she did, as the previous poster noted, one person can't delegitimate anything....even gamergate.

She's actually very good at what she does and has done nothing negligible to Feminism's reputation at all. She hasn't "delegitimized" feminism at all and doesn't deserve being compared to a psycho.

You're quite the hostile one, and you're not doing much to convince people your cause is a well-reasoned one.

She's actually quite good at what she does and has contributed to important feminist discourses. She doesn't "fuck" up and doesn't deserve being compared to a psycho.

If gender was never the issue for you, then no. However, gender and sex have clearly been an issue for you, so your question is irrelevant.

I asked about Heidegger the Final Fantasy VII character, not the Existentialist philosopher. Thanks for the extensive answer, though.

I say "misogynist" because it DOES mean something: hatred of women. And you have shown a decidedly irrational and unfounded hatred towards the three women we've discussed.

Nothing Thunderfoot—that loathsome stealer of private FTB e-mails—says debunks Sarkeesian's arguments in any way. Try again.

I never "threw my lot in with anybody;" I just pointed out how ridiculous your depraved hatred for those three women is.

Yes, depraved hatred is absolutely accurate. You continue to show so in your last post. And at least you admit you're being belligerent; that's a start.

Denying evidence isn't harassment; anyone who thinks so is severely thin-skinned. I suggest you toughen yours up. And I didn't deny your evidence; I completely debunked it. Big difference. I always accept facts when they are actual evidence; you just keep failing to provide any evidence. It's clear by now you…

You think I've harassed you, guy? If so, please show me where and how. If you do, I will apologize profusely. Of course, we both know evidence isn't your strong point...;)

Uh-oh, you're resorting to hostile personal attacks after your erroneous "arguments" have been debunked; that's a gamergate specialty...;)

No, we have just established that Sarkeesian DID do research and effectively used it as supported evidence. Now you're just completely shooting down everything I have to say without any shred of evidence. I already don't take your discussion seriously, since you haven't successfully supported any of your arguments…

I didn't dismiss it solely on their side. I dismissed it based on its bias AND its fantastical, unproven speculations founded on very flimsy "evidence." Don't you think it's naive to use a biased blog with fantastical, unproven speculations founded on very flimsy "evidence" as evidence to support your argument? If…