Probably around -10. Rosie O'Donnell. Paula Poundstone. A few others I couldn't name. Not a huge sample size, granted, but enough to form an opinion.

What people consider funny is subjective. I personally have never encountered a comedienne that I consider funny. Every female stand-up routine I've ever seen has been cringe-worthy.

Let me guess, you thought Mark McGuire was taking andro and not steroids...

There was no "low carb" diet. He lost weight because he cycled off the roids for a little while.

He had to cycle off at some point. I'm sure he's either started back on them or will at some point soon. By the playoffs he'll be back to normal.

They're not the same though. You don't need two feet inbounds on a fumble recovery. You don't need to make a football move to have a fumble recovery. You don't need to hold the ball all the way through the ground on a fumble recovery. I don't know where people are getting that idea from.

He does establish himself inbounds when his foot hits the ground inbounds before the the rest of his body lands out of bounds. That's all he needed. He doesn't have to carry it through hitting the ground because he's not making a catch.

But he recovered after that. Once he had possession in the end zone, which he did while in mid-air, the play is over and it's a touchdown.

The fact that injustice exists does not mean right and wrong is conditional; it means that wrong sometimes wins.

Right and wrong is not conditional.

Oh, I agree that he is and should be tried as an adult. I just think Michael Brown shouldn't be referred to as a child. Victim or not, he was an adult.

Did she lose everything, or did she never put in the effort (not just work, but depriving yourself of wants you can't afford) in the first place?

I want her to take care of herself. She's had 70 years to accrue enough to do that, especially with supplemental income.

Not seeing how that justifies the difference. 18 years old is either childhood or not; it can't be one only when it suits you and the other when it doesn't.

Shame on her for failing to take care of herself and instead taking from others in order to do so.

I agree, but it's funny an an 18-year old accused of rape is referred to as an adult while an 18-year-old shot by a police officer is referred to as a kid.

What seems to be missing is the reason for that picture. It's shown because it was a fumble at the goal line in the final minutes that saved the game; not because the kid was hurt.

Can't "intelligence" mean different things in the context of sports and real life though?

But can't sports intelligence and actually intelligence be considered different?

Isn't it possible that sports intelligence and actual intelligence are different things?