It is a catch-all for behaviors that Jezebel doesn't like but can't necessarily be called sexist or racist.

Yeah, but aren't you guys the ones who routinely bash non-guaranteed contracts as funny money? So in that sense, Brady is giving up something: the security of guaranteed money. For a guy who will be 38 years old when he takes his first snap next season, that's no small thing.

And sarcasm isn't your forte.

As a Jew, I thought it was pretty okay.

"Tammy seems to misunderstand Melissa McCarthy's appeal"

So, in other words, you found reasons to doubt your report but reported it anyway? The sort of thing for which you rake others over the coals?

Two things:

"An 80,000 lb rig"

That's not how you spell amazing.

"he'll be sad for the choices he made."

Another approach, not listed here but totally valid, is to do all of the above, add an enormous amount of rum, whiskey and brandy, and let the entire thing sit and meld for, say, three or four weeks. The alcohol concentration will murder any unfriendly germs (it's basically creamy Listerine) and preserve both the milk…

Yes, and it was no accident, either. Welker beat the dog on porpoise.

Your answer is exactly the problem I'm having. I asked an honest, sincere question. Your reaction was to insult me, while giving a thoughtful response. However, another person had a completely different answer and encouraged the question and gave an equally thoughtful response. Two different people, two highly…

I am a good white person. ... And do you know what? I don't see a need to apologize for it.

Dear Watt, I wrote you but you still ain't calling

Or maybe she wanted to show her asshole friend just how wrong she was. The friend was saying that two teenagers must be up to no good because they were hanging out in Tuhoy's store, Tuhoy not only proved the friend wrong, but also showed her that her shitty behavior wasn't accepted in her store, (and even more…

It's shit like this article that keeps people from doing nice things for fear of giving off the wrong message.

Jesus Christ, she was being fucking nice. Her asshole friend assumed they were doing something wrong, when really they were just trying to go do something fun and couldn't afford it. She assumed that there was more to the story than them being "up to no good," went and asked - a novel concept, I know - and was right.…

She didn't assume that the person with her did.

The tone and delivery of this article is confusing. What she did was...wrong? Because it was...paternalistic? Or because she asked people to not judge others based on race? Not being sarcastic here, just deeply confused by the mobius strip that is Gawker racial politics.