Jerykk
Jerykk
Jerykk

We sure CS keys are sold on the Market? I just checked and didn’t see any. I still see TF2 keys but no CS keys.

Yeah, it’s not a miracle at all. Valve wanted a killer app for the Index so they made one.

Your post..? You just keep repeating that all metrics and standards are irrelevant and that only your opinions matter. That’s not much of a post.

I noticed you keep excluding OpenCritic and Steam in your attempted rebuttals. It’s almost like you don’t want to acknowledge that the three most popular aggregate rating sources directly contradict your opinion.

It’s nice that you don’t care about Metacritic or OpenCritic or Steam ratings or any other quantifiable metric for quality. Unfortunately, I don’t really care about your arbitrary opinions. They need to be supported by facts and logic. Or in this case, basic math.

3.5 / 5 = 70%. OpenCritic and Metacritic describe 70% as Mixed or Average/Fair. Avatar has a 72 aggregate review score on both sites. Therefore, the critical consensus is that Avatar is Mixed or Average/Fair or, in star ratings, 3.5 out of 5 stars. On a 3 star scale, 70% would be 2.1 stars, rounded down to 2 stars for

3.5/5 is 70% so those statements conflict with one another.

Again, you’re bad at math. 80% = good. Failing = 59%. 70% is closer to 80% than 59%.

70% isn’t near failing. It’s average/mixed/okay/fair/mediocre. I’m pretty sure we’ve already covered this.

If you consider math stupid, sure. 3.5 is 70% of 5. There’s nothing subjective about that. If you’re offended by objective reality, that certainly explains most of your opinions.

Now I’m really curious as to where you actually went to school. First you say 83% is a C, now 60% is apparently an F instead of a D.

70 is halfway between 3 stars and 4 stars, yes. 3.5 x 20 = 70. Math is amazing!

Seems pretty logical to me. 3/5 = 60%. 3.5/5 = 70%. Therefore, Avatar would have received 3.5 stars on the 5 star rating scale.

Wait, now you’re just contradicting yourself. This is what you said earlier:

Alright, you’re just wasting my time if you can’t even pretend to say anything of substance. At least pessimism puts a little bit of effort into his trolling.

You seem confused. 3 stars = 3 x 20% = 60%. 3.5 stars = 3.5 x 20% = 70%. C would be 70, not 60, which is why 3.5 = C = okay/mediocre/fair/average/mixed.

If the quality scale is 0-100 and that’s divided into 5 stars, then 1 star = 20 percent. Therefore, 3.5 stars = 70%. 4 stars = 80%. 5 stars = 100%. This is basic math.

Interesting that you specifically chose to say “an Avatar video game” instead of “the Avatar video game.” Why the distinction? Sure, there have been a few Avatar games released in the past but clearly the one released a month ago would be most relevant, no?

You stated that 83 was a C in your school so your school experience clearly wasn’t standard. Also worth nothing that to real human beings, the difference between a C and C- is irrelevant. When people rate things they’ve watched or played, they give general ratings like “it was okay” or “it was good.” They don’t say

Sorry, you’re talking out of your ass again. Metacritic categorizes 72 as “Mixed or Average” and OpenCritic categorizes it as “Fair.” If you disagree, that’s fine but your opinion isn’t representative of the general population’s.