JeffOwl
JeffOwl
JeffOwl

Here is my confusion... I can walk into my polling place and just say my name, if it is on the list I get a ballot and I vote. If I go into a different polling place I can give a different name and as long as that person doesn’t actually show up, how would they know?

Up in Spokane, as of 10 years ago, his actions on the ground were being used as examples of what not to do. I don’t know that I would have the presence of mind to do the textbook things under those circumstances, so this isn’t so much me criticizing.

O’Grady

It doesn’t do what you say with the wake turbulence. It does use long wavelengths to detect stealthish aircraft, similar to what was used by the Serbs. It is very sensitive and long range, but that is at the mercy of the weather and solar activity, which it does a great job of detecting.

In the first picture, is that an exposed fuel tank directly under the driver’s ass? It has no protection whatsoever (the fuel tank, not his ass).

Wait, I was told that getting a DL or state ID card was too hard and too much of a burden. How is this going to help?

How do they know the extent of voter fraud? It is an honest question. I just don’t know where they come up with the figures.

I will admit I never followed this closely, and it wasn’t clear to me from the article, but I could have missed it... Do we know for a fact that this is true? Was Johnson ever convicted of anything?

I think they would love for you to pay a base price plus usage like utilities. See what’s happening in Cell Phone plans. I’m sure the cable providers would especially love that because they could start making even more money off of Netflix, Hulu, etc...

The security they have on cars is a joke, they want to put this stuff on motorcycles? A small hiccup in a car could be an inconvenience where on a motorcycle it could be death.

Saw something like this live at an airshow years ago. Part of a segment called Tora Tora Tora. It was pretty cool. It was dead quite while a narrator described the weather and such at Pearl Harbor before the attack. As he got to the point of the attack, a few Zero’s seemingly came out of nowhere and flew low over the

The whole point is that you admit that you didn’t even know there was a C model flying and they you go on to say that it is brave to fly it off a carrier deck. Clearly you also didn’t know that they previously flew them off a carrier deck almost a year ago, and wouldn’t have known about any of the land based testing

Lol. See, you were doing so well with your trolling and then you just went too far. Anyway, it isn’t proper to make threats against someone’s life. Even with the anonymity of the internet.

Nothing is a basic human right that requires others to do things for you. That includes healthcare and making drugs. What if a drug company decides not to pursue development and testing of a drug that may help you because they want to focus on more potentially profitable drugs? have they violated your rights? Clearly

I get the frustration. I am frustrated too. There is plenty of reasons to be pissed at Lockheed. But before we put this all on them, remember that meeting this criteria wasn’t part of the original requirements. This was added on late in the game after the design was done. I agree that it is needed, and should be met,

I think you make some good point. Lets put this in perspective. The excerpt below is from an Air Force Times article in March of this year. Note that the F-35 ejection seat envelope is 0 to 600 Knots, 150 Knots higher than the previous seat. Nobody wants to talk about that because that wouldn’t be popular around here.

Don’t know what I’m talking about? Because I wasn’t aware of the C model flying?

Aftermarket stealth reduces the signature of the aircraft but much less so than designing it in from the start. The exact figures are going to be classified so I doubt we’ll see anyone giving “real” numbers here.

From what I understand the Marines taking the B has more to do with the fact that, such as it is, the F-35 is more capable than the Harriers they already have. The Navy doesn’t have Harriers and wants full Block 3 capability before going operational.

So he points out correctly that you don’t know what you’re talking about and you counter with a straw man that isn’t even related to the original subject?