Depends on the state, but fired for poor performance usually gets you unemployment benefits, fired for misconduct not as much.

But nobody likes a quitter.

I’m pretty sure that’s the NOS

One other thing Tyler forgot to mention when comparing these to the Wasp in terms of purchase price and operating cost: The Wasp displaces twice what the Mistral does, carries twice the number of troops, has more boat, vehicle, and aircraft capability. And it does this while being 10-20% faster.

I have almost always had them come up with a “fee” after the price negotiation and I always say “that isn’t the price we discussed.” “But it is mandatory, I don’t have a choice” “Then it comes out of your end because that wasn’t the ‘all - in’ price we agreed upon.” The fee usually stays in but it always gets taken…

Yes, the factory will likely happen. Whoever buys them will just have to make sure they aren’t painted with lead paint and don’t use formaldehyde in the insulation.

Unless they clean out their entire tops levels of management, I’m okay with ruining them.

Polaris does demo trucks with the Victory and Indian motorcycles. They should do it with the slingshot. Probably be a pretty tame ride though if you have to follow their leader.

I appreciate the well reasoned response. The F-22 had way more issues than I think people remember. The sofware was crap, much of the electronics were crap. F-22 has more crashes per flight hour than F-35 (none). I believe final F-22 production cost was on the order of $150M, compared to the F-35 which is down around…

You understand it for Hooters but not a casino? Hooters’ business model is to sell overpriced food and drinks. They don’t compete on quality or cost, they do it on the appearance of their servers. Why is it so hard to believe a casino would do the same thing?

Companies change the rules all the time: eliminate pension, reduce health coverage, change dress code, ban smoking on the entire property (not just inside or near doorways), eliminate jobs, change job descriptions, reorganize, etc... Unless you have a contact or some such employment agreement, you are out of luck.…

Because the first time we let a pilot train on an aircraft they should be releasing weapons? Because they don’t need time to get used to how the thing flys? Because they don’t need training on those systems that do work?

And these same types of people were saying the same things about the F-22 10 years ago. Now they say we should just buy more of them. Meh, no pleasing some people.

Yeah, F-104 was pretty awsome in it’s day. Broke so many fricken records.

I don’t know. The lack of any explosives might have been a giveaway, but then I’m not an english teacher.

Not to mention every part imaginable in stock

No. In the US you do not charge a police line with something that could cause mass casualties (unless it is heavily armored like the bulldozer shown elsewhere in the comments). You would likely be shot.

Perfect weapon for when the zombies come

English teacher, let’s be clear.

Ok. Where is the actual explosive in that picture? I get that an english teacher could mistake that for a bomb timing mechanism, but where is the actual bomb part of the bomb?