Jecht342
Jecht342
Jecht342

BUT PUERTO RICO IS AN ISLAND!!!!!

Don’t look at me.

Agreed. There’s a limit to the level of self-laughies I’m willing to tolerate and Jimmy Fallon has been surpassing it since his SNL days.

This! Taking a personality out of a specific media environment (ie, tailored audience of aged conservative Christians) for another and expecting success is like expecting a shark to be an effective predator on land.

They could send her out to “urban” areas to give unsolicited advice. That might go over well.

Art Guys[tm]

Its an attitude that appears to be pervasive throughout Hollywood. If you are successful and make the studios lots of money, you can do whatever you want and are untouchable. Money makes right and everyone else will stay silent about it.

All of those things are things he said during his act.

When I was a kid, I used to wonder, “What does ESPN stand for?”

Genuinely curious as to their justification as well. From the outside looking in, it appears that they’re trying really hard to destroy a man’s career based on a rumor that’s been repeatedly discredited and denied by all parties the alleged sexual misconduct was supposed to have involved. It also appears that over

I agree... why include CK in the picture header and not reference him in the article if he is “problematic”? The first two were referenced by name, CK — no mention at all... That feels more “problematic” than anything else.

*edited for punctuation

Has there been any responses to the Jezebel (or was it Splinternews) call for people to come forward about Louis CK? If not, there’s no proof. Why does the site keep condemning by association then? What’s your editorial justification?

really... theres no need to own anything other than a bolt action rifle or a shotgun..

How about forcing gun owners to buy liability insurance for each weapon like they do cars? It does not infringe on the right to bear arms, but acts as part of the well regulated militia section that the NRA and their ilk ignore.

Right.

Dissent, but obviously subjective. Part of what made Frank work for me in DDS2 was certainly the contrast between Frank and Matt and the rapport between Frank and Karen. It also made it easier that Frank was not the star and often the antagonist. It’s possible that Punisher will be a bad show, no question, but I’m

100%, “well if we can’t stop everyone what’s the point of taking any of the guns away!” fucking imbred simply minded stupid fucks make me so angry I could just....

This, exactly. We live in a society based on rules, and while none of them are ever 100% effective, we would never seriously consider just resorting to pure anarchy. That is insane on a fundamental level.

EXACTLY! I am tired of that bullshit excuse. If we only do things if they are 100% effective nothing would ever get done.

Exactly! Even if the laws wouldn’t have prevented THIS incident (which as pointed out by the thread starter, might be bullshit), how many OTHER deaths could be prevented?