Jecht342
Jecht342
Jecht342

I suppose that’s generally true, but if you are allowing 3rd parties to post anything on your site at all, generally you have a profanity filter.

How do they not have this in a basic profanity filter? I assume if I went on there as a third party seller and named my hat “A great motherfucking hat” they’d catch that.

No, I think you are wrong. If they don’t get the 50 votes to take it to the floor, there will be no vote at all. I think.

On Slate’s political podcast last week, there was in interesting discussion about this. John Dickerson was saying that it would pass because leadership needed it to. It not passing wasn’t really an option for them. Then Emily Bazelon pointed out that while that is true for leadership, a bunch of the individual

I was discussing this with a friend to day and we thought the difference between the parties was interesting. If it was the Democrats trying to do this (like it was 8 years ago) there wouldn’t be one person in the room advocating that we kill poor people.

That’s a good one. But then they need to have solid policy proposals to go with it. It would be best if they came up with the basics of a bill to fix Obamacare, as well as one for infrastructure and one aimed at income inequality. Then name them memorably, come up with the talking points, and stay on message.

But that doesn’t do anything to help them in the next election because we’re not in a declared war. They need something to define them.

It’s true, and it’s sad, and it’s wrong. Police are supposed to protect us, but they have somehow become a serious threat. In other western countries, the police are polite and friendly and recognize that they are public servants. For some reason, in the US they are more like a third world militia. We depend on them

That’s bad enough, but knowing that the Russians have everyone’s data is actually less concerning than having all of it public for everyone to know. I mean, the Russians are bad and may do bad things with it, but it’s not the same as having everyone who could do something bad with it know.

I don’t think they will. Leadership needs this bill politically, but the actual members don’t. If you are Susan Collins or Dean Heller, there’s no reason to vote for this. It’s deeply unpopular and it’s going to be even more so in a bunch of specific states. They did a poll and they asked about support of Republican

Yeah, but again, they have characters and they are going to reboot them anyway. When they went from Jay to Barry or Barry to Wally, they weren’t trying to make any political statement. It was white guy to white guy to white guy, each becoming Flash. It’s something they are going to do anyway. It’s because The Flash

I agree, but I also think that they are so delusional that they actually believe the comparison. I think they really do think that in their crusade to take rights away from others, they believe they are on the side of freedom.

Not necessarily. I have a relative who got into debt really badly and killed himself because he knew the life insurance would cover a big chunk of it.

It’s not just the term “religious freedom.” All of their messaging is supposed to make it seem like they are the ones fighting against discrimination even though they are the ones fighting for it. That’s why it doesn’t surprise me to hear bigots trying to use MLK. They honestly think they are the side standing up for

I’m sure what you’re implying is a total stretch...

I’m not saying that every time we want a new minority character we should do it that way, but this already an accepted practice. They’ve been doing this for a half century. When you want to reboot a classic superhero, you give a new character the title. I’m all for brand new miority characters, but this is a practice

It was such an odd comment on his part. I don’t even understand that in this case. I don’t get where having an open conversation fits in. The dude harassed people because he hated them. Now he expects them to sit down with him and what? Explain to him why they aren’t actually terrible? This guy is the worst.

Yeah, it seems like he was coached. It sounds like he is going down a checklist after being coached. The wording is even awkward, and clearly not just him naturally speaking.

I don’t know. The history of switching out the person who is the super hero goes back a very long time. At least as far as when DC started the Silver Age by replacing the old Flash (Jay Garrick) with Barry Allen. They did that with a few characters. That’s a half century ago. It’s an accepted practice. I don’t know

The story the Trump side is telling right now is “Yes, the Russians contacted Don Jr. and asked him to commit a serious federal crime, and yes he eagerly agreed to do it, and yes, he brought two senior campaign staffers so that we’d all be implicated, but the Russians didn’t play ball, so we didn’t do anything wrong.