Jean_Rhys_Lives
Jean Rhys Lives
Jean_Rhys_Lives

It was more about the subtle insertion and clarification of class. It just felt unnecessary.

If you follow the link, you can see larger versions of the images and it gives what section that they're put in. For instance, Spencer and Evans are in the "Tail Section," Ed Harris is in the "Engine Section," Song Kang-ho (insert fangirling screech here) is in the prison section along with Ko Asung (who played

My personal favorite:

"Zombieland" is essentially one of those genre films that I consistently come back to as an example of a movie that does a lot of things correctly.

What the shit, Georgians.

I wouldn't expect most obits of male scientists mention sex to be honest. This particular criteria is addressing the presumption that the male sex is the neutral default, whereas the female sex is something that's unusual or out of the ordinary. There's no real reason to go out of one's way to mention the fact that

I saw THAT TOO! I wanna play at their house.

Actually, the Oz books are considered very much part of the fairy tale tradition by scholars

let's recast sherlock holmes as a woman, put a woman at the helm in moby dick,

"Spider-Man" was....ok. I haven't seen 127 Hours* but I heard he's really good, and Pineapple Express was primarily enjoyable because of him, but I decidedly didn't like him in "Rise of the Planet of the Apes." I just don't think I believed him as a scientist, as ridiculous as that sounds, and I think he routinely

Wow, guy. Wow. Where to start. The Oz books, first of all, are not fairy tales as they're not rooted in any sort of folkloric tradition. More accurately, it belongs in the fantasy genre, and the last time I checked, there's not exactly a dearth of male protagonists in fantasy. Also did he watch any movies beyond the

But don't you see that this is a missed opportunity on the part of filmmakers to portray sympathetic and genuine heroines that have great source material and are rooted in nostalgia? A male perspective doesn't necessarily make the story or world any richer, and what's the point when its operating on the cliched

Because that's what the American film industry is really lacking. Male perspective.

Never forget.

He's not so much insisting, and I'm pretty sure he's amenable to my position. It's more of a personality difference in that I'm much more open to doing things the unconventional way, and he likes to have everything neat and orderly and done the way everyone else has done it in the past. We don't clash very often, and

Was this before or after Wild Wild West?*

Yup. We've both got some serious conversations ahead of us. The other thing that's interesting in my case is that he is Sikh (whereas I was raised Catholic), and there is an interesting story in Sikhism about one of their Gurus who specifically says that no woman should have to take her husband's name, and that she

Also, he wasn't the only one writing it. Stephen Gaghan has the primary writing credit, and he wrote Traffic and Syriana which were both excellent, and pretty decent respectively. Of course, I don't know if he's done science fiction before, but this feels pretty good so far.

I'm getting married in about six months, and I don't want to give up my surname. I like it. I like the way it sounds, I'm proud of its history, and most of my friends use it when addressing me instead of my first name, so it feels that much more a part of me. I've raised the issue with my future husband who is having

Also, she was super high. I may not always like Girls, but I feel like that line was clearly lampshading. It's incredibly self-aware and self-deprecating, so, yeah. Lots of people missing the point on that one.