I’d be highly suspicious of the chrome wheel arch trim...there is usually rust, a lot of rust underneath.
I’d be highly suspicious of the chrome wheel arch trim...there is usually rust, a lot of rust underneath.
Two options come to my mind:
I also dig this in a weird way, but this front and rear treatment should be done to either a 3rd/4th-gen Camaro or a C5 vette.
They likely think filling up with premium gas instead of regular is what a maintenance history consists of...and a LUXRY BEAST needs its maintenance.
Indeed. They just scream “Third owner”
Compared to recent cars ( I am looking at you, BMW,...again) it has become much more friendly to the eye.
Doing a proper LS conversion will not be cheap either. Also it will push this thing very deep into ‘Someone else’s project’-territory.
You mean it is not the Pyrenees in the background, but the Pyrenees...and this is because the car had drum brakes instead of disc brakes?
Hackepeter ftw.
The general idea is to have a car, which shows the traces of wear instead of looking better than from factory afterbeing sandblasted during concourse restauration. A car which shows that it lived a full live has more character than a perfect cosmetically flawless one.
A tiny closed box and a propane space heater?
I can not understand all the hate....you go to a very fancy restaurant and *order* a menu with 27 courses for a stupid amount of money.
This is supposed to be a concert stage, hence it needs bad accoustics.
At $6k, there are surely AMG C or E class cars, which are cheaper than that.
-Reliable
At least $5 millions of laundered money are in this.
Clean out the junk. Just because it is a junker, there is no need for having tons of junk bogging down the remaining bit of handling.
The Trabant had 4-on-the-tree.....but 5 is plain weird.