Some people’s faces do that as they hit their fifties. She’s just aging. I think she looks fine, and I don’t even like the show or her character.

It’s very realistic that Rory is rudderless right now. I had to send a media list to someone that I had for this non-profit venture I’m a part of and the amount of people who weren’t at the places where I had them listed was staggering. Just ask the fine folks who write for this publication how much turnover there is…

She was there, in the lobby at Chilton. She has short hair now.

Aged and gained some weight (not that there is anything wrong with that!). She gained some during Parenthood and it definitely changed her face.

When they first announced a revival, I was expecting to find out that Rory was youngest editor ever at Big Name Newspaper or Youngest Pulitzer Prize winner or something like that. Instead, it seems like she is struggling a little, and it will be interesting to see if it is because she finally burst out of the bubble…

Since trailers and previews for Gilmore Girls have ALWAYS been awful, I don’t judge the Show by it. (Except... Where is Paris? It´s unforgivable to leave her out of anything ever!) Basically, I’m so gonna watch it! Also the giant ass portrait of Richard & Emily´s excitement about it is flipping hilarious!

It’s possible...but with all the name options out there, it seems weird they would re-use one. Unless it is to deliberately confuse those of us looking at IMDB for hints.

I don’t get the vibe that she’s had work done (I don’t see pinched here), I honestly think she’s just aged and her makeup is really airbrushed on for the HD cameras. (No snark or shaming. She doesn’t need our approval on her looks.)

I don’t think that the trailer itself lived up to the quality of the original FULL episodes--but I think if you did a trailer based on the original episodes, it wouldn’t either! It seemed to slightly be a caricature of the original show. BUT, that’s pretty normal for trailers, especially when they want to quickly…

It will be fine as long as it’s Nardini free . . . I actually don’t hate April like a lot of people do. Anna though is pure garbage. She’s just garbage.

Seriously. WHY CAN’T WE JUST HAVE THIS ONE THING? 2016 HAS BLOWN SO HARD CAN’T WE JUST HAVE THIS CHEESY REBOOT WITHOUT CRITICISM MY GOD?

This trailer looks so awful that I legitimately frowned the whole way through it, but that will in no way stop me from forcing my husband takes the kids out of the house the day after Thanksgiving so that I can binge watch all 4 episodes. Nothing can temper my excitement.

Disagree. I think that Gilmore Girls has a very good reason for coming back, because of the awful last season and the fact that they did not know, when filming it, that the last episode was actually going to be the last. Lorelai is annoying, sure, but she’s supposed to be - the character is flawed and actually not the…

I guess two people watching the same show can have very different takeaways from it. I saw a lot of layers of guilt and vulnerability to Jones under the sadness and anger.

No matter how anyone feels about her, that is so awful and I hope she coped and recovered from the events smoothly :(

I’m super hopeful that the CMT changeover will be a gamechanger. Last season was a mess.

Last season was such a goddamn shitshow that I was hate-watching it by the end. But I will probably watch season 5 because supposedly they got new show runners. I’m also a glutton and will ride shows until they die, no matter how bad it gets.

So you’re saying he seeks out the truth/facts first before making assumptions.

From some of the stuff she’s said on Snapchat, it seems likely that they were offered a show and turned it down.

I just can’t with these two. I get that they are fully “on brand” for the bachelor franchise but watching Jojo navigate Jordan’s famewhoring and womanizing ways, or Shawn and Kaitlyn building an instagram empire would have been infinitely more interesting than these two bland, bland, BLAND people.