Kylie doesn’t even look like Kylie.

The wisdom teeth episode is what sold me forever. I think we watched it 3 times in a row. I am Abbi dancing in that episode...

If they’re relevant, of course. But not to the extent that a dude growing and selling weed would end up with a life sentence based solely on the number of convictions he’s had before, and that the judge isn’t given any discretion on that because of ridiculous mandatory sentencing laws.

But he already served time for that so it shouldn’t be relevant here, especially since he was just growing weed.

I had seen this picture elsewhere with a note of the designer of the gowns credited. I suspected then that the BFF likely got a lot of stuff gratis as a result of having Taylor involved. “Let me just call my friend Reem, she’ll hook you up with an AWESOME gown!”

I feel like if you chose Taylor as your maid of honor, you’re looking to reap the secondhand benefits of fame for your wedding day. You want your small town relatives to be all abuzz at your celebrity bestie and you definitely want your wedding described in Vogue friggin’ magazine.

And for me to get so upset here, on the Today show, with you guys, means there’s something there.

So if you cannot buy a dildo in Texas but you CAN use one there what are the rules of online sales? Like if you are residing in Texas can you buy a dildo from a non Texas based company? Or is the sale still considered on Texan ground? Also it makes sense that he would fight against dildos, he's got to be jealous of…

Just from the headline, I’m picturing Ted Cruz physically fighting off a bunch of giant dildos.

This is probably the most astute description of this movie I’ve ever read lol. Except one thing: This would have been the VERY BEST Lifetime movie.

Nay. I read somewhere that Daryl and Michonne merchandise sells the most out of any of the other characters’, so I think they’re here to stay (for a while, at least).

This show doesn’t have commercial breaks, advertisers and sponsors pull their resources together to create a filler show to put in between their commercials.

It’s kind of sickening to put it in this perspective, but $200,000 is like chump change for them. This isn’t a big deal at all - he’s suing for exactly the amount of money he’s owed (assuming his contract is legit) and no extraneous damages or anything. There’s nothing here to spiral out of control.

It’s a lot more straightforward than that. He’s simply alleging breach of contract. Per his complaint, the contract (the Operative Agreement) states that he is owed $32.5K for each episode of GG produced and aired and WB has made it clear that they have no intention of respecting that contract. So he’s coming for his…

I mean $32.5K per episode is really not that much money (it’s a HUGE amount of money to me but in terms of budgets for TV shows). It’s weird that they aren’t willing to pay him anything.

I doubt it will ruin anything. I’m not sure what their production budgets are like, but what he's asking for isn't a huge amount of money in the grand scheme. Given his reasonable ask, it might settle quietly.

Because it’s a continuation of his show and (I think) his and his company’s intellectual property, I think that entitles him to stuff. WB’s argument seems like it’s based on two things: that it isn’t the same series (even though it is, if it continues where the other series left off) and that it’s being produced for…

I skimmed the complaint. In it he alleges that per the terms of the Operative Agreement he is entitled to $32.5K for each “original episode” of GG that is aired.

Two things:

“Reboot” is the wrong word. Bringing something back is not a “reboot”. A reboot is when you start from scratch on an IP’s continuity. This is a continuation, revival or sequel (any of those terms work) because all the previous episodes of the show are canon.

Sorry, the use of Reboot where it doesn’t actually…

DAWSON’S CREEK ISN’T ON NETFLIX ANYMORE.