The rest of the ruling lets Apple still decide what they can or cannot allow on the App Store. the only change they must make is allow for 3rd party payments and let developers communicate with users with the users permission.

The ruling didn't say Apple has to allow other app stores, just that they need to allow developers to use other payment systems.

From my understanding, this is true. But my reading of how everything went down, Apple just skated past the idea that they are a monopoly, but the judge did say they were being anti-competitive.

If Apple (and Google) started banning apps that opened up their own in-app purchases, and then couldn’t make a good excuse…

Thats not actually how this played out. I dont think anyone other then this click baity headline would say that Epic won. Epic does not get their own distribution platform in iOS, Epic does not get their own payment processing in iOS. What Epic and all other developers did win is a victory for common sense. They are…

I stand by my previous suggestion of Senor Julio Respects-o-women-o.

Hello Newman?

Name it after John Wa...ohhh, wait a minute.

Tex Sideburns

TBH Jessie McCree is such a good cowboy name they should make the non-virtual human change his name 

Six-shooter football team

Richard Nixon.

High Noonman

Sure, if they want to get sued by Gearbox for infringing on their IP of Face McShooty

Cowboy Mccowboy

Generic White Cowboy

That’d be his gun

Or Shooty McShootface

But he also argues that he’s having trouble getting major sponsors, given the first thing everyone knows about him is that he was banned for unknown reasons.

No-one has any “dirt” on him of any meaningful kind, because unlike Bialik he hasn’t spend literally decades publicly courting controversy with new-age/evolutionary biology-type bullshit beliefs. With Bialik it’s basically:

Don’t forget Susan/Susie/Sue.