JWAdvocate83
JWAdvocate83
JWAdvocate83

That’s the difference between popularity and notoriety (e.g. meme of “rent-free” guy who peed his pants.) If you’re a certain VC firm that’s only trying to make money, fair enough, the Amouranth article generator will get clicks, but it’ll be at the cost of actual respect. Do it long enough, and folks will move on —

And there it is, folks. (And I *like* Levi!)

Okay, it’s boring, agreed!

Every other gaming site has long since figured out how to run a site that isn’t constantly glitching out and reloading, and doesn’t relegate half of the comments to “the grays.” Why is this still a problem, after *years?!*

Alright, I’ll say it.

I get that it just came out, but my liegebut we’re getting bombarded with these articles, and there are games out there other than Starfield!

If Starfield is not the future of video games, why is every other article on this site about Starfield?

What?! But you said *I* was your accountant! 😞

I mean, it’s not as if he has millions of subscribers and his videos consistently trend within an hour of posting them. It’s a ghost town.

I’d think this would be covered by the TOS agreement on the website anyway.”

You’re thinking about it way too hard. Parties to the communication don’t need to render consent to one-another. Parties *not* a part of the communication do.

“Negative press?” Lol

Funny how all these people who claim to be anti capitalist and anti ceo and anti corporation now want corporations to be responsible for their {healthcare}”

No trolling intended here — but is this so bad?

It’s ya boy, Logan Paul!

Anime is more than the shonen action genre it’s most associated with.”

Stop buying unfinished games. Stop rewarding greed. Stop incentivizing lazy release practices.

An agreement for 60% off the top will get you a bar letter 😅

I’m guessing (and OP feel free to correct me) what OP means is this is an attempt by E3 to filter out (or at least further disengage) those streamers who might have controversial commentary, or limit the extent to which overly critical streamers may affect the perception of various presenters to the audience.

True, but (afaik) Draftkings/Fanduel doesn’t have betting lines for children’s sports. 

So, a guy who has a history of abusing whistleblowers becomes a major corporation’s chief administrative officer — and you really need an explanation as to why this is a Bad Thing? You asked whether he should just never work again — the answer is, not in any capacity of authority that enables him to do the same shit