You mean Hipstermatic, surely.

Tape still remains the most accurate and musical recording medium. Today's producers spend hundreds of dollars on plugins that simulate the compression and saturation that tape bestows upon audio. Apart from the hiss, it always sounded way better than CD's and had a much higher dynamic range than vinyl. I have some…

SHOULD BE BOOBS.

I wonder how many cats are going to die in that thing.

So they're just everyday photos of New York but from a few feet lower than usual, with bicycle wheels in half of the frame. Breathtaking!

Meh, ever since I started my Spotify subscription I've maybe used iTunes about once a month. It's almost dead to me now.

Am I supposed to be surprised? Why wouldn't calculators have advanced in the same way smartphones have?

Why cannot I unsee this?

I'm just grateful for things like this which come along and reveal which of our friends and acquaintances are as thick as pigshit. The people who were posing this copyright crap on their wall the other day, were the same people who were posting the "did you know an onion left out in a room will absorb all the germs…

Elbow or no elbow, I was still able to crack one off the wrist.

I produce music as a hobby so I'm aware of the ins and outs of compression. However, I do believe that a lot of the reputation of CD's sounding "colder" than vinyl came from the early days of the format, during which audio engineers really had no clue how to master for CD. They basically transferred the same…

I wouldn't say analog recording is "perfectly limitless." It has a very limited dynamic range compared to digital recording (60dB)

I know I am, but what are you?

LOL - ironically enough, that reply was also yuppie, emo, millennial shit.

I really like looking at retro sites like this. It gives me a nice warm fuzzy feeling of nostalgia, and reminds me of a time when the internet seemed like another world...a warm, friendly community where you actually felt a part of the web of connections that we all take for granted these days. It had a bizarre,…

Yay! Better pictures!

They are no doubt using a speed test on Google's own servers.

7 years of a crappy "turbo" Time Warner Cable connection which slows down to a sub-dialup crawl at least 5 times a night and constantly has my modem rebooting over and over, with the incompetent TWC morons refusing to do anything about it except send a token guy over a few times a year to tell me that there is nothing…

So I'm currently sporting his campaign wallpaper on my desktop. Stretched out quite nicely, not noticing any blockiness at all! What do you think?

Have you seen the downloadable desktop wallpapers? They're like postage stamps! Even at 1990's resolutions, they're going to need stretching beyond all recognition. Totally awesome.