J-Ellis
J.Ellis
J-Ellis

SAS is victim blaming, which is just one level below saying it's okay to resort to violence. His argument is that women somehow bring this on themselves, that's where he loses all credibility. This wasn't a street fight, we don't need to analyze what his wife may have done to instigate the attack. There's video of

NPO's trademark things all the time, from names of events to slogans to logos. There's absolutely nothing weird or disingenuous about that.

Dan Pallotta, "The Way We Think About Charity is Dead Wrong." Komen is no shining beacon in the world of NPO's, but anyone complaining about their tactics should at least watch that TED talk or read Pallotta's book "Uncharitable."

You're being ridiculous. No one is suggesting there shouldn't be consequences when a woman hits a man, they're suggesting those consequences shouldn't include being punched back. Nice straw man though.

"I tip poorly if I receive poor food or service."

That's fair. If you feel you need to hit your kids in order to teach them a lesson go right ahead, bro.

Cool. So if my wife doesn't listen to me it's okay for me to her with a belt too, right? No? It's only okay to hit kids? Yeah, that makes sense.

No, it's a pour spout.

Carpenter, construction workers, etc... aren't routinely given injections of pain-masking drugs and told they're good to go.

That's not the case in my experience. I turned it on yesterday and was instructed to come back to the apple website in three days to activate it, and that was completely independent of any other changes.

Not true. Salaries, lunch, offices etc...are considered administrative costs not operational costs. Most non-profits actually spend between 20-30% of revenue on administrative costs and many work extremely hard to keep that number below 10%.

Better article explaining it here:

Putting everything else aside, I look at it this way: Hypothetically, let's say he has an outstanding bill with AT&T of $180. AT&T gave him a bill credit of $180 to stay, but never locked him in to a new contract. He then left AT&T. He still has to pay the ETF and $400 for the new phones at Verizon, but he doesn't

Prepare to have your mind blown........different people actually like different products. I know, so weird, right?

Serious question, whom did Apple sue for innovating? Whether or not you agree with the suit/verdict, you can't really make the argument that they've sued anyone for innovating. In fact, it's the exact opposite. The argument that suing companies who succeed by copying inherently leads to less innovation is so

These images came out about a year and a half ago. Definitely not representative of the new movie or the comic con footage.