That's not the case in my experience. I turned it on yesterday and was instructed to come back to the apple website in three days to activate it, and that was completely independent of any other changes.

Not true. Salaries, lunch, offices etc...are considered administrative costs not operational costs. Most non-profits actually spend between 20-30% of revenue on administrative costs and many work extremely hard to keep that number below 10%.

Better article explaining it here:

Putting everything else aside, I look at it this way: Hypothetically, let's say he has an outstanding bill with AT&T of $180. AT&T gave him a bill credit of $180 to stay, but never locked him in to a new contract. He then left AT&T. He still has to pay the ETF and $400 for the new phones at Verizon, but he doesn't…

Prepare to have your mind blown........different people actually like different products. I know, so weird, right?

Serious question, whom did Apple sue for innovating? Whether or not you agree with the suit/verdict, you can't really make the argument that they've sued anyone for innovating. In fact, it's the exact opposite. The argument that suing companies who succeed by copying inherently leads to less innovation is so…

These images came out about a year and a half ago. Definitely not representative of the new movie or the comic con footage.