The matter-of-fact answer is that this was basically '60s-era clickbait. They did a statistically unlikely number of covers featuring Superman acting like an asshole/straight-up psychopath just so people would buy the comic to see what the fuck was going on. Nine times out of 10 the scene never showed up in the comic.

They get much worse (by which I mean funnier).

Being a dick is the best possible tribute to Superman's memory.

Duhhh, stay out of Riverdale.

Far be it from me to interrupt your fanfiction.

Shhh, wingnuts are so cute when they think they know Teh Big Werds.

I said fuck-all about how much I "support this." My entire point was the legal right (and doy-level logic) of a corporation to oust a chief executive for behavior that damages their brand.

Have fun splittin' those hairs, champ.

Here is an entire article by a mainstream newspaper implying they violated Eich's right to free speech.

Ah, and here we go with "You are totally a hypocrite because of how I bet you would react in a scenario I made up." Keep going, I've almost got bingo.

Ah, we got straight to the bullshit "Obama supported Prop 8" meme in record time. You are not terribly good at this, little guy.

I love how conservatives think private companies should be forced to keep employing someone when they hate the right people.

Why are we not still doing phrasing?

You SAY that, but once I dropped my monster condom that I use for my Magnum dong, and I can tell you, there's nothing funny about that.

Wasn't really feeling* the Dongs sketch. It felt like they wanted as many musical sketches as possible due to Kendrick's presence and they wanted another ensemble dance bit with all the women, and actually figuring out a premise came last* in the process.

The "banality of evil" indeed.

Sure. But a parent should put that in context for their kid. If they don't, the kid is going to find it on their own and consume it without that context. Same principle as the Talk.

I feel like teaching kids to distinguish fiction from reality and allowing them to partake in fiction aren't mutually exclusive.

I mean, even if they understand that, it'll come back to this weird conservative equation of "you shouldn't say that" with "I am trying to compel you, against your will, to stop saying it on account of I'm Hitler."

I get that. I just think that if there's no way to make this movie and make it about the person whose story it actually is, maybe we should think about whether or not a movie should be made period. I mean, maybe so. We haven't seen it in practice. But this isn't a movie that should be made just to be made.