No need to thank me, citizen.

Here's my only objection: Clark Kent is a ridiculous enough facade as it is, and I don't know if I believe anyone who bought Elba as an unassuming dork would be able to type or spell. My vote is still for John Stewart, or Amazo if they rewrite him to be a Handsomeness Android.

Didn't know Molly Parker, Beautiful Premium Cable Naiad was in this until about an hour ago and I'm even more excited.

"Let me be clear" indeed.

That one is annoying as hell, mostly because anyone who says something is created by corporations always somehow has it in their head that they're the ones who figured this one out. Well-spotted, Tintin.

I skimmed this and then reread it, and the first time around I just took it completely for granted that "Katy-tera Tekakwitha" was something she'd already done.

Do landlords not take quirk anymore?
...well, fuck.

Between this and the "Arthur" remake, clearly her agent heard me say I'd watch her in just about anything and took that as a challenge.

A woman I work with was an extra this season. Friday is going to be hell of unproductive because everyone is going to be surreptitiously trying to pick her out while they're on deadline.

"Can't fire yourself from one cannon directly into another at the opposite end of the room?" said Gatsby. "Why, of course you can!"

Go home, western civilization, you're drunk.

Seriously, Piers Morgan, cram it with walnuts, you Earth 2 Colin Firth-looking ass.

Being a blogger makes you an "obesity expert" now? I would be terrible at it because I have an overabundance of integrity, or at the very least Irish Catholic guilt, but wingnut welfare seems like a really sweet racket if one can get past that.

The time to make a live-action Rescue Rangers (and I'm not necessarily saying there ever was one) was in the early to mid-00s. Now all the people who watched it as kids are aging out of that "ALL POP CULTURE WAS PERFECT WHEN I WAS A KID SHARE IF U AGREE" phase.

As a dude, I can say there's no experience more harrowing than someone failing to reward my mediocrity.

I don't think he doesn't care, nor do I think he's a misogynist, and I appreciate his treatment of women in his work, especially compared to the bulk of mainstream fiction. I just think it's kind of weird and smug to cite that as somehow proof that that tweet wasn't meant the way it sounded.

Namedropping his own work is like a super-narcissistic variation on "I have several X friends." "Hey, if I didn't like women, would I be so wonderful and empathetic in writing them?"

Wait, if Philip Seymour Hoffman is dead, how is his character in "Happiness" still around?