"We older players" includes me, chum. I had a Atari 2600 and Colecovision growing up. Your position, and the position of other gamers on this issue, is entitled garbage. You aren't getting screwed over, you just assume you deserve things that cost money without paying for them.

I'm gonna tell you right now, blue nads suck! And there ain't no silver lining either! :)

I don't see how anyone is getting "screwed over" at all, period, end of discussion. You're not entitled to anything more than what Capcom is willing to sell you, for whatever price they are willing to sell it for, and all the constant whining and griping and complaining makes gamers sound like spoiled children.

I seriously don't get it. Which part is the punchline again?

That could be right... my memory tends towards the shaky over the years and miles.

Well, wait... IIRC, according to one of the novels the Vulcan brain is actually "damaged" by their emotional discipline, and is physically split into a whole bunch of semi-isolated sections.

Feed Any Vegan or Food Allergy-Prone Friend...

Well, it isn't like anyone's looking at her face?

Nobody is forcing to do anything. Video games are a cross between entertainment and a toy. If you don't like one toy, buy a different toy.

You don't have a right to ANYTHING. If they want to put the entire next game on the disc on the release date and charge you an extra $60 to unlock it, then that's what they can do, and you have NO RIGHT to that content either.

Pretty much, although at this point so many gamers are so stuck in "entitled crybaby" mode that who knows what will happen? Apparently, they want game developers to put out new games that they love, every week, for free, and they'll never stop complaining until that's what they get.

Yep, pretty much Highlander II, of the choices that were left.

Oh, I totally thought they were wrong from the jump... but I also remember them saying that they were going to have to check everything a million times and invited other people to try to figure out where they screwed up. I guess the only shame is that it became a big media thing.

I'm actually sort of disappointed that this happened. My understanding of the initial announcement was that the team was "guardedly optimistic" about their results, were completely transparent about things, and invited other groups to double-check every aspect of their work. It seems that the resignations were more…

I use a different calculation based on how much materials cost, the amount of extra materials I'm going to need if I screw things up, how much damage I can cause by screwing things up, and the likelihood that I'm going to wind up having to hire someone else to fix my mistakes AND to the original job I was working on.

Really? Because we can ALL do something... starting with changing the channel. :)

My preference would have been for Steven Spielberg to have been the original director, then for him to die (horribly!), and then for Kubrick to have taken over directing the Spielberg-approved script. It would have been wonderfully subversive to have Kubrick's eye and mindset applied to Spielberg's shmaltz-ridden…

But inaction lets the dirtbag pirates win!

Wait... either they are evil and no one should buy their product and it is crazy to support them, or they are super popular and everyone loves them and they make lots of money... but then your point is nonsense. Which is it? Is it stupid to love them because they are crap, or is it stupid to expect them to care about…

You can do a similar trick with a bottle of beer. You flip the bottle over into the glass and slowly pull it out so that most of the foam stays in the bottle but you get all the aeration and released aromatics.