More irrelevancies. Your viewpoint is worthless, you can't be bothered to address the subject at hand, and your trolling is second-rate. You're a fool and I'm not going to waste any more time on you. You don't matter.

Again, you talk about irrelevancies. What does British politics have to do with the bad science the Creation Museum perpetuates? Your viewpoint is nothing but noise, a distraction that absolutely nobody should take seriously.

I meant, don't be quite so transparent in being disingenuous. The fact that you couch this in political terms speaks to the lack of value in your viewpoint. This isn't about conservative vs. liberal; this is about about good science vs. bad science.

He describes himself as a "software engineer" in one of his comments but who the hell knows what that means. Maybe he's a script kiddie who jerks off to the Anonymous twitter feed.

A cursory examination of his previous comments shows that he doesn't even believe what he says. He's called religion "mental illness" and "fairy tales". This asshole is just a lazy, amateur troll, stirring shit up while he fucks around at his software engineer job on the Friday before a long weekend.

After spending five minutes to review your comment history, I see that you've described religion as "fairy tales" and religious belief as "mental illness". If you're going to troll, at least have the decency to create a separate burner account so you're not so transparent.

I agree. That scene had my rolling my eyes in the theater and I actually laughed out loud when Spock screamed "KHAAAAAAN". That emotion wasn't earned and I imagine the writers thought they were so clever with the way to managed to shoehorn two iconic moments from ST:2 into this steaming pile. It came off as…

This is a defense of the OP against other commenters claiming STID isn't the worst Star Trek movie.

You're getting no love for that comment, so allow this Trekkie to get your back. STID is the absolute worst Star Trek movie ever made. Star Trek movie. Is it a bad movie? Hell no. Great production values, cinematography, special effects, and it's exciting as hell. But as a Star Trek movie, it's a rotting pile of…

I think people are bothered by other people saying they don't eat gluten, but then can't explain why.

Also ask yourself: is the Chairman of the FCC a former lobbyist for the cable and wireless industries?

Haha, I love shitheels like you who dismiss posts, in which you are called out, in a desperate attempt to save face. You gonna take your ball home with you too?

Nope, didn't read it at all. But I wasn't offering quid pro quo, so I'm not sure why you think you can make any demands of me.

No.

Yeah, I'm getting tired of going around and around with you too. I feel like I understand very well the points you're making. I just think you're wrong.

Victim-blaming:

It's irrelevant either way. You've already said it wouldn't change your mind, even if it's statistically significant.

I never said it was representative. I was using it refute your claim that the OP's experience was fictitious or exaggerated.

I actually agree with you. I don't support a kill switch either. I was taking issue with your claims that the OP's claims were exaggerated. In my neighborhood, his claims are not. People here are specifically being targeted for their smartphones.

Yes. In which case, I stand by my original statement, that you won't be convinced otherwise. I say this since you are making a moral argument, in which case the data is irrelevant.