Oh really? So you refuse to play games like Diablo 3 on PC? So many games these days are always online, especially on PC.
Oh really? So you refuse to play games like Diablo 3 on PC? So many games these days are always online, especially on PC.
Not really. Plenty of gamers don’t play on PC or consoles. They play Fortnite on their phones. They play Angry Birds. Plenty of them are very young and didn’t start gaming until after CoD stopped being as popular as it once was. Plenty of them only have exposure to games like the Sims. Or Minecraft. You’re way…
I never claimed they aren’t justified in their lawsuit. I’m saying it’s a stretch to claim that they made billions because they used Humvees in their games. If Rockstar did the scenario you stated it’d be insane to say that Rockstar made billions because they used Crown Vics in their game.
Sure you could make the claim that they profited off of it if they sold unlicensed toys that are specifically HMMWVs. But billions of dollars? You seriously think Activision made billions on sales of HMMWV toys?
It’s ridiculous to compare PES vs FIFA situation to CoD’s situation with Humvees. First of all if PES used the FIFA license it would have it in the title. CoD isn’t nearly that associated with the Hummer brand. CoD skyrocketed in popularity long before Modern Warfare and many of its later games don’t even use Humvees…
And just because a product is sold to the government it means it’s just as iconic? Okay that just makes no sense. It has nothing to do with what companies sold products to the government and everything to do with how prolific than imagery is to that organization. It’s like how Crown Vics were associated with cop cars…
lol. No way. Not even close. I say that as someone that’s played a large portion of the franchise.
I’m not saying it’s not a fixture for certain subsections of gamers. I’m saying that comparing Call of Duty to gaming overall vs Humvees to military aesthetics overall is pretty flawed. Almost all military personnel have seen or ridden a Humvee. Not even close to the same proportion of gamers have seen or played Call…
That’s a stretch. What percentage of military personnel have been in a Humvee? What percentage of gamers have played Call of Duty. Humvees are a fixture of military hardware. Call of Duty isn’t. It’d be more like a character using an Xbox controller or a computer using Windows as the OS in a movie. Those are fixtures.…
Maybe not but the wording seems to imply that the game made that much money because they used Humvees which is clearly untrue.
One thing that bothered me about First Class is they killed Darwin. That shouldn’t be possible. His mutant ability is that his body adapts to any situation to survive. In the comics it even adapted to become a death god since that’s the only way to survive being touched by another death god.
I’m not saying they can’t. I’m saying that you can’t say it’s bullshit that they haven’t enforced it by assuming they will. Just because someone can do something by legal right doesn’t mean they will. Just like you can legally say fuck you to everyone you meet doesn’t mean you will. It’s not foolish to say that not…
No you can’t because not everything in every contract is enforced.
“That was fine for PS4 controllers—there Scuf is basically the only manufacturer outside of Sony doing high-end controllers for the system.”
It’s only bunk if they enforce it. You can’t assume they will or won’t. Either way, even if they do it’s more beneficial to have money now that you have to pay back later than to have to pay it now. He can use that money to make more money on his own. It’s not like a later due date is the same net effect.
“fighting came community” is what kleenexes are for.
Dude. I studied it for four years. I’ve also studied linguistics. It being a “beat” doesn’t mean it’s a syllable. Similarly, a period between sentences isn’t a syllable. A comma to separate clauses isn’t a syllable.
You’d think they’d at least be able to shorten it to 4. Like アシュクラ. It would fall in line with how they do other things like purikura.
I’ve never heard anyone consider the small tsu it’s own syllable. It’s like saying shu sound is two syllables because it uses a small ユ.
It’s not quoting a work if you’re not actually using quotes and don’t make it clear that you’re quoting something vs passing off said quote as your own words.