IOS7shakeshead
IOS7shakeshead
IOS7shakeshead

Buy ammo! In a total society collapse You can use it for defense, bartering and for taking other peoples gold, whisky and toilet paper.

Yes, for nearly 30 years. For us, recreational shopping is pretty much over. We already have what we want. In fact, we're still trying to get rid of our excess shit (no sewer jokes, please) because uncluttered square footage in our house is now worth more than a lot of the junk currently occupying that space.

No kiddin! My wife has to browse anywhere we shop. I understand spending lots of time if you're looking for something expensive, or that you'll spend a huge amount of time dealing with if you hate it, or both, but I've seen my wife browsing the milk case in Kroger for 15 minutes before...

This study's conclusions seem seriously flawed. Just off the top of my head, the reasons those people who book at work might be less satisfied:

#5 is huge. I didn't realize how much so until I managed people. Now I immediately fess up when I screw up, but not before gathering as much info as possible on how it happened and how it can be fixed. If you go into the confession armed with solutions, your boss (and everyone else) will instinctively move on to that

Writer has no idea what Clickbait is, spends entire article defending tabloid reporting, never once actually mentioning the process of clickbait or real clickbait.

You really are going through some hoops to pretend that you guys don't do some shady ass things for clicks, which also pay your salaries.

So let me get this straight, this is an article about click baiting while the article itself is a form of click baiting. Starts off with an interesting story of gland thievery and transponds into an incoherent rant. This is honestly the most senseless thing i have read all year.

tl,dr: Gawker writer complains

"Gland Larceny" - that's gold, Jerry!

Taken seriously by whom?

Whoops, wrong thread. New Kinja sucks.

You're making no distinction between journalism, headline writing, and re-posting a link to a video of some trash you know will go viral. Tim, you guys do some amazing journalistic work, as you were careful to point out above. You also post clickbait. Likewise, (some) newspapers do great journalistic work alongside

For an organization whose bread and butter is ridiculing established media (often justifiably so), you guys sure are thin skinned.

Idiot clicks on stupid headline. What happens next will astound you.

Guy with job defends job.

No. I will not shut up. There's a difference between writing a good headline and the "Most amazing story you'll see all day!" garbage HuffPo (and Gawker sometimes) is known for. That is the fucking worst.

Sensationalized headlines used to make not-so-life-or-death stories sound like its LITERALLY LIFE OR DEATH is lame click baity garbage used to drive eyes to stories that don't deserve it.

Man... that's one long-ass horn tone.

Why does everything have to be a video these days? I'm sick of having to watch videos on Yahoo! News, and it's just as irritating here.