How have I never seen this before. This is amazing.
How have I never seen this before. This is amazing.
ELOhell is a real thing. You can see it on full display in the front half of any number of unranked to diamond series.
It’s the other way around, actually. The white is the collar, the orange is obviously the bloated fleshy wattle, and the yellow is the toupee. Stick it point first into something appropriately dark to mimic the suit, and you’ve got a perfect replica.
Candycorn, maybe.
Corn? Children of the Pumpkin more like.
If that’s true then why do these posts never get old?
Yes, we were talking about fact checking, and the fact that Hillary Clinton doesn’t lie nearly as much or in anything resembling the same way as Donald Trump is relevant to that discussion. You got to see it in real time last night. Trump brags “that makes me smart” when confronted with his tax avoidance, and then,…
So there is a single actual lie there--the sniper fire thing--and then there’s a politician changing her view on issues or engaging in standard election puffery (e.g. “I’m second to no one in progressive values”), and then some bullshit about her emails that leans heavily on noted buffoon Trey Gowdy’s declarations. …
Okay:
Man, I wish. There has been an alarming decline in the amount of Portia De Rossi that I see on a week-to-week basis.
I’m sure that’s what people thought in the Weimar Republic and the Russia of Nicholas II.
Here are a few things Trump has actually said that are wrong as a matter of objectively verifiable fact. These are the kinds of things that a moderator should point out bear no relation to reality:
Facts are facts. If Donald Trump says something like “Inner-city crime is reaching record levels” or “Barack Obama founded ISIS” or “the government is funding illegal immigrants coming in and through your border, right through Phoenix” or “I don’t know David Duke” or “General Pershing shot 49 Muslim Philippino rebels…
Perfect to a T. Just keep saying the word “referee” over and over again. Every contest needs a referee, a fair impartial arbiter or right and wrong, calling balls and strikes--just hammer that analogy.
Two more wins to beat their 1935 season. If they win 6 of the next 7, they can beat their 1909 and 1910 seasons, though it’s impossible at this point to match or top 1907 or 1906 (116 regular season wins!).
The way they’ve been getting treated by the Cubs lately, the Cards probably also feel like they need to wear diapers.
An immigrant. Jesus people, how many of you can make the same comment? Where do you live that you don’t have immigrants who refer to themselves as first generation, second generation and so on?
Yes, but also they’ve replaced being employed full-time with being employed part-time which I’m sure is a completely voluntary decision by rational economic actors and not a result of a secular and structural shift in our economy brought about by a labor movement close to total collapse and thirty-six years of elite…
The posters above are being overbroad when they say “this statement is not hearsay,” though they are likely right that it is admissible. These are statements made other than while testifying in a trial, and they could be offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Those are the two elements that make something…
People denied that fencing was a sport? Are you serious? Fencing? Only-event-contested-by-professional-athletes-at-the-1896-Olympics fencing?