I have to assume they’ll show everything in its proper aspect ratio, just like whenever I watch any of the older (pre-Enterprise) Star Trek shows on Netflix.

Heck, I’m still not done with games from 20 or 30 years ago or more. I haven’t even touched lots of games other folks here moved on from a long time ago (in part because I haven’t kept up with later hardware releases - I’m still planning on getting a PS4, as I have been for years, but somehow haven’t gotten around to…

I also wrote George Lucas in 1994, and I also got a reply from someone at Lucasfilm! My correspondence was a bit different - I sent him a birthday card for his big 5-0 that year (but also noting how much I’d enjoyed all his movies, not just the Star Wars ones but everything else, and how I was looking forward to…

I’d love it if it were just Kermit hosting a talk show, like a whole series as a spiritual successor to that one time Kermit guest-hosted The Tonight Show back in the ‘70s when Johnny Carson was on vacation.

The thing I don’t get is why the shows on the Disney season sets are incomplete. Of course music rights issues have forced all sorts of shows to be cut up and altered and whatnot, but... the thing is, prior to the Disney season sets, Time-Life had some single-disc releases (with I think three episodes per disc), and…

Why would it not be? Were all copies of Candy Crush on all devices everywhere supposed to magically self-destruct five years ago or something?

Towards the end, I still liked Lorelai, but Rory became terrible.

Okay, but even so, isn’t TRON Legacy a sequel to TRON? And should they therefore not complement one another, rather than be in competition? Isn’t the second movie meant to appeal to people who like the first?

The OP may or may not have been old enough to see it upon release; they didn’t say. They indicated only that they’d seen it, not whether they’d seen it in 1972. I’ve seen movies released decades before I was born. Haven’t you?

Argh - $89.99, not $79.99. Steeper, yes, but not without precedent.

Oops, make that $30, not $40. But still.

I think it’s more of an aberration that they did LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens. They’d done several LEGO Star Wars games before, but they’d always been based upon multiple movies (or TV episodes, in the case of The Clone Wars).

$79.99 is actually close to typical for 751 pieces (and there are a lot more part colors on the interior of the build; they’re just covered up by the monochromatic exterior).

The Saturn V is unusually inexpensive for its size, while this is actually $40 less than the Saturn V (not the same price) and also includes two new part molds.

I’ve seen others suggest it, but I don’t think it’ll happen. LEGO, Hasbro, and Mattel are all one another’s top competitors. If Disney bought LEGO, it’d probably mean the end of a lot of Hasbro’s and Mattel’s Disney licenses. At the same time, LEGO would likely no longer get licenses from Warner Bros., Universal,…

That general pricing (10 cents per piece) is more of a general guideline than a hard and fast rule; it really depends on the piece (though licensing undoubtedly indeed plays a role as well).

While there are certainly parts of “Steamboat Willie” that the Disney of today probably wishes were different, and might even edit out of current copies or screenings (as discussed by other respondents here), I think there’s no way they’d try to completely bury something so foundational to their defining character,…

What? No, this has almost 800 pieces.

Probably not many, since the number buying these tickets are presumably a subset of the number that can afford them.

For many years, one of the criticisms I’ve frequently seen leveled at George Lucas has that despite his oft-stated desire to move past his big franchise(s) and work on smaller, more experimental, art-housey movies, he hasn’t done so, instead focusing on churning out more Star Wars (and, occasionally, Indiana Jones).…