I feel like the back-slapping "my man ain't like that" crew is slightly missing the point. Yes, there are men who can not have sex, men who will want to just cuddle at times, men who don't need to act like pigs, and men who want relationships. I'm not sure much has changed in that arena. The question is, after men get…

This whole idea of vaginal purity is some backwards ass shit. Obviously, no person should subject themselves/their bodies to situations they find uncomfortable. And certainly women shouldn't allow men to selfishly peer pressure them into making decisions about sex. Unless, of course, that man is an invisible man in…

Also, women be shoppin'.

I do. But I also engage in the gift of doing things and going places. I'm much more interested in the experiential than the material. Mind you, I don't use this philosophy to swear off gifts, but rather to do it on days mandated by some advertising agency or marketing department to guilt me into buying shit no one…

If the individual wearing the vagina shirt was a big fan of wearing dog cones, this would be pornography.

And why does it have to be black? Because it's dangerous, fiscally irresponsible, and sneaks up on you? Black Friday, you so racist.

It's amazing how we re-enforce a culture of buying shit, even for people we kind of don't like, just to continue not liking them for the remainder of the year.

Wait a minute. What's wrong with the guy who insists he looks great, even with a huge gut? Me thinks that's the point of getting over body image. I think what you want to say is that everyone should be able to be the person who can feel comfortable with however they look. You do realize you're criminalizing the result…

So if in every group there is ONE idiot, ignore the idiot. There are plenty of us who agree and you are ignoring us to rant to/about the caveman. Don't be the person who talks to the wall when there are people in the room.

This article is reverse-racist against men culture. *tries not to blink*

Am I the only one who finds it ridiculous that fake, scripted wrestling matches get covered in a newspaper? It's like a newspaper covering Jersey Shore. I mean they have fucking writers for fucks sake.

Sorry to hear about that. And then imagine the institutional/law enforcement involvement in covering things up because an assailant is good at football. It's hard to even imagine the lasting, emotional damage.

The article says so many things. About him, the school, and bros. Bro camaraderie can be vile, and I say that as someone who played two sports in college. I'd never stand and support someone who behaved like this clown. Teammate or not. But apparently there are teammates, coaches, administrators, and police officers…

This is the story you want to read on Stevens. Real investigative journalism. And then you'll probably read the rest of the series on UW football and get disgusted. He's basically a paralegal by now. http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2004147460_rbstevens270.html

Where'd you get the "just realized" part from? I'm saying that the cheating part of the story is completely a non-story. It's not an anomaly. And women cheat too? That's so crazy.

Because powerful man #1, married for X years did what? And powerful man #2 all them years ago did what? Tiger, too? JFK? Hot dang! Maybe one day we can explore the notion that men aren't better than their dicks. And maybe that it isn't just powerful men, but all men who are predisposed.

You know what else already has all those things? Richmond. And universities. And the Catholic Church. And, um, civilization. But he makes a good point.

I'm waiting for the UEFA probe, spearheaded by the English FA, into Ibra fixing. Humans don't even attempt a bicycle kick from 25 yards out. No way he does that naturally. — Greg LeMond.