You have no awareness of the giant cloud of irony surrounding you saying this right? None of this is an original thought. If it’s a waste of time to express those ideas, you’ve wasted your time, haven’t you?

Why does a review need to be “original” and what is “original” in the context of a review, and why does that imply that they don’t have a need to write these reviews/there’s no value for the reviews they write?

So, you can only have an original take if you’re a paid games reviewer? Or what is the implication here?

Because people don’t need to be published on a website or a magazine to have something worth saying, that they want to share.

If you’re not even going to say how I’m being disingenious in this discussion, aren’t you yourself being a dishonest participant in this discussion?

That is positively one of the most childish reactions I’ve seen in response to being called out about your poor argumentation. Congratulations. You’re mentally a 12 year old.

So, to summarize, the only reason anyone could possibly be against this law is because GOOGLE TOLD THEM TO? So, anyone who feels that this law is what it is, is just wrong, and you’re right, and it’s all google brainwashing us?

I mean PDP being the largest subscribed channel, aside from that indian music video channel that’s artificially propped up by phone sales directly correlating to channel follows in India, is enough for them to realize it’s not niche content.

Gametheory is about as reliable as wiping your ass with your bare hand. There’s a reason the entire gaming community makes fun of MatPat, and it’s not purely out of good humour. It’s at his expense for his wild, unsupported claims that he then goes on to say “That’s just a theory”, despite the fact theories are…

Games are not a niche market on Youtube.

I’m no way shape or form can you describe streaming as “stealing content” you loon. 

It’s very draconian.

Imagine if Tenchu, and Ninja Gaiden had a bastard child, who then might the child of Dark Souls and Bloodbourne, and those two bastards had a super bastard.

No, that’s not what he said at all.

You can compare literally anyone being genuinely aghast something they care about is being broken down by uncaring sycophants to Hitler. Does that mean it’s right? No, it just means you don’t have a more substantive reply than “tone policing”.

Those changes literally only happened after public pressure though?

And those people not caring is how things get to the point where games are sold piecemeal with content cut from the outset, and we’re bled dry. So, as much as I cannot change those people not caring, them not caring has a direct effect on my enjoyment of products down the line. If enough people don’t care, and can be…

No, it’s not. It’s literally a point by point comparison. If one is failing, or lacking, in literally every area, how is it an “Opinion”?

No, it’s literally “a worse storefront”.

My reply to that would be this image.