I am, as I have said 3 times, in favor of a FREE MARKET solution. That means no mandates for ANYONE, not me, not you, not employers.

You could then buy coverage that met your needs, and keep everyone else out of your decisions.

When you ask someone to pay for something, or worse, use force or law to COMPEL them to pay…

Not repeating what I said, already answered this fallacious bullshit in another reply.

You're wrong.

Nope. And that's actually my point - decouple it.

Allow the same tax breaks to individuals that businesses get, businesses would give their employees a raise, and in a FREE market [not Obamacare] you as an individual could then choose a plan that suited your needs, without necessitating the tacit approval of those who…

That could be because you and your ilk keep expanding the meaning of that word exponentially.

Let the hate wave commence, I come bearing lux et veritas.

Good Day.

Because that's tyrannical bullshit.

If my money goes to something, I have a say in it - that means if it's tax money,
you damn well bet I have a say, and I have an opinion.

And that means if I am the one footing the goddamn bill for your coverage, I have
an inherent right to choose what coverage I buy.

Freedom of…

How about separating the two - if you're so keen on your boss staying out of your decisions, why do you want them to pay for them?

If we decoupled insurance from employment, it resolves portability - you no longer have to stay in a job you hate just for the insurance - and the employer could give you a higher salary.

You…

Give me a Tharja that I can take home for my very own forever and ever and I can die happy....

Your article, in a nutshell, to a rational person:

For a group so obsessed with "Rights" they sure looooooove denying them to anything heterosexual with a penis.

I presume because he knew the reason the accusation was made public was so that people like you could pillory him, and was defending his character.

That's among the astounding leaps Feminsts are making in the definition of "Rape", now, yes.

You're not insane. They are actually promoting that.

But don't you know that ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS?!?

Gosh, it's like you haven't been made into a brainwashed beta-male Feminist boot-licker, yet!

Call the Tumblrsphere! We got a live one, here!

Ah, correlation = causation?

Of course his right to a fair trial, an objective Judge, and the right to assert innocence can't be the "end" of it - how else would you attract swarms of Feminazi to bag on men and whinge about "Rape Culture" if you let that be the end of the discussion?

According to Feminsm, regret = rape.

You have exposed one of the central flaws of modern Feminism and its rape epidemic - they keep expanding the definition of 'rape' to include anything you regret, anything where alcohol is involved, it's ridiculous - and it should be patently insulting to women because the embedded assumption is that women cannot be…

So, you're not a Marxist, you're an Anarcho-Syndicalist or something similar?

I'm an Anarcho-Capitalist, so I suppose we share SOME ideas.... but I disagree with most of the premise you operate on, and it sounds like you do mine.

At least you're civil and we have an understanding - your cohorts, the social engineers,…

"I don't see what he's done wrong so far to warrant any kind of negative reaction."

He's a heterosexual man. That's all the guilt a modern woman needs to condemn him.

Ah, so the default assumption is that he must "continue to be" or be a Feminist to begin with, or he's just guilty sexist trash, right?

In usual form, I see.

I understand some of what you're getting at, but I want to present you with a quote:

"From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs."

This means each person is expected to output 100% of their capability - disregarding the Profit Motive, which Marx found evil [but which I find quite the…