No, it’s not sensible. It’s just a mechanism to feel better about yourself, because you know it’s either/or. Not choosing only defers the decision to others.
No, it’s not sensible. It’s just a mechanism to feel better about yourself, because you know it’s either/or. Not choosing only defers the decision to others.
Ah, the old “I fall for propaganda easily” rationale.
I know you aren’t interested. I’m just describing your position.
Sad thing, not even that. It’s a misunderstanding of Godwin’s Law.
This election should kill the electoral college.
I’m sure you think you’re completely right, but you’re not. It’s a fundamentally cowardly position.
That would not be a bad thing. I mean, painful and hard, but not bad. Like having a surgeon cut you open to remove a tumor.
Yes, a lot of that is true. Also, it does not disagree with what I said.
Not really.
You’re completely, utterly, unarguably wrong. Of the two, it was Hillary Clinton who had a moderately workable plan to help them (if imperfect). It was basically a continuation of what Obama has been proposing... and that the GOP has been blocking.
Nope, coal production is up.
Precisely because it’s sickening, dirty backbreaking work. That makes it pay a premium for those willing to do it.
And Kashif.
And Merle Haggard, and Sharon Jones.
You know, I came to a horrible realization.
The 99% bad apples makes the 1% look bad!
And that’s why they voted for their republican congress and senator lifers.
As far as I can tell, it’s a hot-button issue related to ISIS, it’s something with clear actions to take, and it comes in big-looking blocks instead of the diffuse percolation of normal illegal immigration.
Also, in hindsight, he was spot on in foreign policy. I don’t know if smart or broken clock, but thems the breaks.
Git-R-don’.