GreenTeaParty
GreenTeaParty
GreenTeaParty

Perhaps keep an open mind and think about what I am saying? I am not trolling or even judging people [I don't really care if someone is fat as I believe that is their choice but through taxes it makes it an issue for those Ron Paul types]. What I do see is a flaw in logic. I'm trying to bring people to see that flaw.

Glad you asked and excellent question. For areas such as that [I've had people in rural Alabama and Georgia ask me this where some chains were put out of business by WM leaving them with only the evil choice]. Some of what you say is true, and is different based on state, program combos[like the addon WIC program],

False analogy. I can eat no veggies and eat fries and still lose weight. Weight doesn't just have a health cost, it has a monetary cost beyond even your own health. Adult+baby car seat sizes / padding, size of the car, card MPG, airplane MPG, amount of bags allowed on an airline, weight of bags allowed on an airline

Good luck getting people not to shame over something. You would have to take away their identity. I find that tribalism is said to be justified in some way through our entire history. Even good things like pride and cultural events contribute to the same sort of identity.

Solved: NewMoney is jealous OldMoney had better exploitation tools.

Exactly, 100% correct. People are picking what risk taking horrible shit is ok to shame or not shame. Ignore the large individual with skin cancer below. You can buy frozen veggies on 2 for 2/3$ at over 2-4lbs of content, seasonal veggies, manager's special meat you buy the day of use, not paying for sugar water, and

Exactly, but those same people do it regarding issues they do not have. The shaming becomes circular logic for someone to say what is and isn't able to be defended. Intellectually vacant standards of shaming can even be seen on this site, and fly in the face of most ideologies. Issues that impact society far less than

Exactly, you have to define center... which then goes into circular logic regarding opinions not facts. This is a problem because center is based on the past views of sexism and self-identification. In this case, the entire problem with gender norms is the idea of gender at all.

Regarding #1:

Like sergio said below, for smaller batches 4lb, Nature's Earthly Choice @ Costco is 8.59-10.99 for 4lbs [depends on location]. People are even buying and reselling on amazon because the same thing goes for 14-31 there.

I am so glad that women in power like this can freely admit when certain aspects of Jez and academic gender theory are completely off base. At the same time they can address real issues like this that aren't coated in logical fallacies. She even brings the "hot topic" / money aspect in. This is great. She did so

Misogyny all around though... one step forward, one back.

Of course, but if men had it their way, far less kissing would happen at all [possibly none in the past, depending on the evolution of].

#CORRECTIONS : His wife made him do it. What is the alternative? Possible divorce and lose half your $$? The guy has an all female staff. To attempt to say he never thought ever about sex [even in a dream/nightmare] with any of the others would be insane.

That is a one-sided viewpoint regarding kissing->sex , though the site is insane so =/=:

Did I say something factually or logically incorrect? Why would you want to restrict my ability to speak? Do you not understand the importance of?

<img src="" />

"that was probably crafted by an angry 15-year-old who lives in the stomach of a Balrog. It claims to contain "the official Slut Formula." Through some sort of complicated algorithm (misogyny x cum-sock/I hate vaginas), the site's author alleges"

You could have actually done the objective thing and looked at anatomy books online relating to nerve endings.