You said "Yeah, because dewdz were once owned as slaves, just like African Americans, because of their gender"

Pointing out logical fallacies is not mansplaining, which is a sexist term to begin with as it already had a term from history [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_homine… ].

Is that good or bad?

I know, that's why i listed her measuremets. If you actually cared to read, inflection point ratios don't end, the smaller[ratio not size] the better in every study [flaw in evolution].

Firstly, even the BLIND like a low WHR- http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-…

That design is horrible. She isn't even using:

By dudes you mean spoiled ten year olds with iPads?

Nice rant. You stated "the vast majority" yet have not shown that. I never excused fathers for anything. I linked you to government and study websites. The laws you speak of do not apply that way in each state, which is the same reason I don't like custody statistics [Many states including Vermont do not report that…

That was the result, yes... and castrated. Do you even know your history? It is sort proof of the Patriarchy in a nutshell. Jefferson is rolling in his grave at your remark:

If you were correct, two wrongs don't make a right. The fact that you are stating they do is in of itself a logical fallacy. For example, if I stated I feared black people because they [insert crime here] more, would that be correct? Nope. Just as there is more to be seen there, there is more to be seen with…

It's the law... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paid_Fami…

It goes very fast. So does shooting a gun. Two months is a LONG time. This is why Google has them working so long and never leaving. Sleep pods, Ikea building services... etc. When you're a serious coder you live online and on your libs... on your upstream, on your gits.

Shocker, I was explained what I said by a woman after asking about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovel… from 1840...

Not really. I first thought to check when I realized her inflection points were such that this was possible: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/chr…

Simple, I count the nips.

That MRA isn't wrong in this case. The title was about objectification as well as a reflection of the article. Hear me out. If he did not make the transformation, he would not be here. If he got hugely fat, it wouldn't be here unless he was being attacked.

"Happy birthday" ???

The total surface area is generally more. You shoot yourself in the foot here. Women do NOT show more parts. Do the math. A bikini is less material, while covering more total individual parts. You haven't taken Anatomy, have you? You need to read what I am saying, verbatim. I do not deal in portion as speedos exist…

Are you kidding me? Wow, you really need to take a look at the history of programming and engineering not just from a USA perspective but in terms of jobs. I've consulted[security and programming] and worked for so many women[DBA / DevOps] that have corrected me on off-the-cuff views like yours[previously mine],…

More total parts are shown with men, that is a fact.